Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct;5(5):720-734.
doi: 10.21037/tau.2016.09.07.

Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature

Aurélie Mbeutcha et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

In the context of customized patient care for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), decision-making could be facilitated by risk assessment and prediction tools. The aim of this study was to provide a critical overview of existing predictive models and to review emerging promising prognostic factors for UTUC. A literature search of articles published in English from January 2000 to June 2016 was performed using PubMed. Studies on risk group stratification models and predictive tools in UTUC were selected, together with studies on predictive factors and biomarkers associated with advanced-stage UTUC and oncological outcomes after surgery. Various predictive tools have been described for advanced-stage UTUC assessment, disease recurrence and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Most of these models are based on well-established prognostic factors such as tumor stage, grade and lymph node (LN) metastasis, but some also integrate newly described prognostic factors and biomarkers. These new prediction tools seem to reach a high level of accuracy, but they lack external validation and decision-making analysis. The combinations of patient-, pathology- and surgery-related factors together with novel biomarkers have led to promising predictive tools for oncological outcomes in UTUC. However, external validation of these predictive models is a prerequisite before their introduction into daily practice. New models predicting response to therapy are urgently needed to allow accurate and safe individualized management in this heterogeneous disease.

Keywords: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); biomarkers; disease recurrence; nomograms; predictive tools; prognosis; prognostic factors; risk stratification; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Shahrokh F. Shariat owns or co-owns the following patents: methods to determine prognosis after therapy for prostate cancer. Granted 2002-09-06; methods to determine prognosis after therapy for bladder cancer. Granted 2003-06-19; prognostic methods for patients with prostatic disease. Granted 2004-08-05; soluble Fas: urinary marker for the detection of bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Granted 2010-07-20. He is advisory board member of Astellas, Cepheid, Ipsen, Jansen, Lilly, Olympus, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Wolff. He is speaker for Astellas, Ipsen, Jansen, Lilly, Olympus, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanochemia, Sanofi, Wolff. Romain Mathieu is consultant for Astellas, Ipsen, Janssen; and he is speaker of Janssen, Sanofi, Novartis, Takeda. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Green DA, Rink M, Xylinas E, et al. Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the upper tract: disparate twins. J Urol 2013;189:1214-21. 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.079 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Compérat E, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma: 2015 Update. Eur Urol 2015;68:868-79. 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.044 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:5-29. 10.3322/caac.21254 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gakis G, Schubert T, Alemozaffar M, et al. Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on upper tract urothelial carcinoma 2016: treatment of localized high-risk disease. World J Urol 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1007/s00345-016-1819-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mbeutcha A, Rouprêt M, Kamat AM, et al. Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review. World J Urol 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1007/s00345-016-1826-2 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources