Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Oct;95(43):e5138.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005138.

The single surgeon learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection: A continuous evolving process through stepwise difficulties

Affiliations
Observational Study

The single surgeon learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection: A continuous evolving process through stepwise difficulties

Federico Tomassini et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the single-surgeon learning curve (SSLC) in laparoscopic liver surgery over an 11-year period with risk-adjusted (RA) cumulative sum control chart analysis.Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is a challenging and highly demanding procedure. No specific data are available for defining the feasibility and reproducibility of the SSLC regarding a consistent and consecutive caseload volume over a specified time period.A total of 319 LLR performed by a single surgeon between June 2003 and May 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. A difficulty scale (DS) ranging from 1 to 10 was created to rate the technical difficulty of each LLR. The risk-adjusted cumulative sum control chart (RA-CUSUM) analysis evaluated conversion rate (CR), operative time (OT) and blood loss (BL). Perioperative morbidity and mortality were also analyzed.The RA-CUSUM analysis of the DS identified 3 different periods: P1 (n = 91 cases), with a mean DS of 3.8; P2 (cases 92-159), with a mean DS of 5.3; and P3 (cases 160-319), with a mean DS of 4.7. P2 presented the highest conversion and morbidity rates with a longer OT, whereas P3 showed the best results (P < 0.001). Fifty cases were needed to achieve a significant decrease in BL. The overall morbidity rate was 13.8%; no perioperative mortality was observed.According to our analysis, at least 160 cases (P3) are needed to complete the SSLC performing safely different types of LLR. A minimum of 50 cases can provide a significant decrease in BL. Based on these findings, a longer learning curve should be anticipated to broaden the indications for LLR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CUSUM analysis of the DS. DS = difficulty scale, CUSUM = cumulative sum control chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
RA-CUSUM analysis of conversion rate. RA-CUSUM = risk-adjusted cumulative sum control chart.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CUSUM analysis of operative time. CUSUM = cumulative sum control chart.
Figure 4
Figure 4
RA-CUSUM analysis of blood losses. RA-CUSUM analysis of blood losses. The arrow indicates the best results after 50 LLR. LLR = Laparoscopic liver resection, RA-CUSUM = risk-adjusted cumulative sum control chart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 2015; 261:619–629. - PubMed
    1. Dagher I, Gayet B, Tzanis D, et al. International experience for laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepato-biliary-Pancreatic Sci 2014; 21:732–736. - PubMed
    1. Ishizawa T, Gumbs AA, Kokudo N, et al. Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg 2012; 256:959–964. - PubMed
    1. Honda G, Kurata M, Okuda Y, et al. Totally laparoscopic hepatectomy exposing the major vessels. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20:435–440. - PubMed
    1. Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection for centrally located tumors close to the hilum, major hepatic veins, or inferior vena cava. Surgery 2013; 153:502–509. - PubMed

Publication types