The EGALITY study: a confirmatory, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar, vs. the originator product in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis
- PMID: 27787890
- DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15152
The EGALITY study: a confirmatory, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar, vs. the originator product in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis
Abstract
Background: GP2015 is a proposed etanercept biosimilar.
Objectives: To demonstrate equivalent efficacy, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and the etanercept originator (ETN, Enbrel® ) in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis.
Methods: In total, 531 eligible patients were randomized 1 : 1 to self-administer GP2015 or ETN twice weekly subcutaneously. Patients with ≥ 50% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) at week 12 were rerandomized to continue the same treatment on a once-weekly dosing schedule or to undergo a sequence of three treatment switches between GP2015 and ETN until week 30. Thereafter, patients continued treatment with the product they had been assigned to last, up to week 52.
Results: The difference in PASI 75 (75% improvement from baseline PASI score) response rates at week 12 between GP2015 and ETN (primary end point) was -2·3%. The 95% confidence interval (-9·85 to 5·30) was well contained within the prespecified margin range of -18 to 18. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events up to week 52 was comparable between continued GP2015 (59·8%) and ETN (57·3%); switching treatments revealed comparable safety profiles. Antidrug antibodies, all non-neutralizing, were limited to five patients on ETN during treatment period 1, and one patient in the switched ETN group, who had been treated with GP2015 for 12 weeks at the time of the finding.
Conclusions: The EGALITY study demonstrated equivalent efficacy and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and ETN. The study results provide the final clinical confirmation of biosimilarity and contribute to the totality of the evidence proposing that GP2015 is an etanercept biosimilar.
© 2016 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.
Similar articles
-
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, or Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with GP2015, an Etanercept Biosimilar: Results from Two Phase III Studies (EGALITY and EQUIRA).Drugs R D. 2025 Jun;25(2):107-115. doi: 10.1007/s40268-025-00507-8. Epub 2025 Apr 25. Drugs R D. 2025. PMID: 40279006 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Multiple switches between GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar, with originator product do not impact efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis: 30-week results from the phase 3, confirmatory EGALITY study.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Mar;32(3):420-427. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14605. Epub 2017 Nov 2. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018. PMID: 28960486 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Switch from reference etanercept to SDZ ETN, an etanercept biosimilar, does not impact efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 48-week results from the phase III, randomized, double-blind EQUIRA study.Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 28;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1907-x. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019. PMID: 31138316 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Characterization and non-clinical assessment of the proposed etanercept biosimilar GP2015 with originator etanercept (Enbrel(®)).Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2016 Oct;16(10):1185-95. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2016.1217329. Epub 2016 Aug 16. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2016. PMID: 27463856 Review.
-
GP2015: An Etanercept Biosimilar.BioDrugs. 2017 Dec;31(6):555-558. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0246-1. BioDrugs. 2017. PMID: 28940172 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Biosimilars: To switch or not to switch - that is the question.Reumatologia. 2020;58(1):1-3. doi: 10.5114/reum.2020.93111. Epub 2020 Feb 28. Reumatologia. 2020. PMID: 32322116 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, or Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with GP2015, an Etanercept Biosimilar: Results from Two Phase III Studies (EGALITY and EQUIRA).Drugs R D. 2025 Jun;25(2):107-115. doi: 10.1007/s40268-025-00507-8. Epub 2025 Apr 25. Drugs R D. 2025. PMID: 40279006 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Switching Between Reference Biologics and Biosimilars for the Treatment of Rheumatology, Gastroenterology, and Dermatology Inflammatory Conditions: Considerations for the Clinician.Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017 Jun;19(6):37. doi: 10.1007/s11926-017-0658-4. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28623625 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biosimilars in rheumatology: A review of the evidence and their place in the treatment algorithm.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Aug 1;56(suppl_4):iv30-iv48. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex277. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017. PMID: 28903543 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Increasing Access to Effective Systemic Treatments in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Narrative Review.Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Oct;13(10):2171-2185. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01014-x. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 37710078 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical