Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 27;20(1):355.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1532-x.

National survey and point prevalence study of sedation practice in UK critical care

Alvin Richards-Belle  1 , Ruth R Canter  1 , G Sarah Power  1 , Emily J Robinson  1 , Henrik Reschreiter  2 , Hannah Wunsch  3 , Sheila E Harvey  4
Affiliations

National survey and point prevalence study of sedation practice in UK critical care

Alvin Richards-Belle et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: The present study was designed to (1) establish current sedation practice in UK critical care to inform evidence synthesis and potential future primary research and (2) to compare practice reported via a survey with actual practice assessed in a point prevalence study (PPS).

Methods: UK adult general critical care units were invited to participate in a survey of current sedation practice, and a representative sample of units was invited to participate in a PPS of sedation practice at the patient level. Survey responses were compared with PPS data where both were available.

Results: Survey responses were received from 214 (91 %) of 235 eligible critical care units. Of these respondents, 57 % reported having a written sedation protocol, 94 % having a policy of daily sedation holds and 94 % using a sedation scale to assess depth of sedation. In the PPS, across units reporting a policy of daily sedation holds, a median of 50 % (IQR 33-75 %) of sedated patients were considered for a sedation hold. A median of 88 % (IQR 63-100 %) of patients were assessed using the same sedation scale as reported in the survey. Both the survey and the PPS indicated propofol as the preferred sedative and alfentanil, fentanyl and morphine as the preferred analgesics. In most of the PPS units, all patients had received the unit's reported first-choice sedative (median across units 100 %, IQR 64-100 %), and a median of 80 % (IQR 67-100 %) of patients had received the unit's reported first-choice analgesic. Most units (83 %) reported in the survey that sedatives are usually administered in combination with analgesics. Across units that participated in the PPS, 69 % of patients had received a combination of agents - most frequently propofol combined with either alfentanil or fentanyl.

Conclusions: Clinical practice reported in the national survey did not accurately reflect actual clinical practice at the patient level observed in the PPS. Employing a mixed methods approach provided a more complete picture of sedation practice in terms of breadth and depth of information.

Keywords: Analgesia; Critical care; Point prevalence; Sedation; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gélinas C, Dasta JF, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):263–306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murdoch S, Cohen A. Intensive care sedation: a review of current British practice. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(7):922–928. doi: 10.1007/s001340051282. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reschreiter H, Maiden M, Kapila A. Sedation practice in the intensive care unit: a UK national survey. Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R152. doi: 10.1186/cc7141. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mehta S, McCullagh I, Burry L. Current sedation practices: lessons learned from international surveys. Crit Care Clin. 2009;25(3):471–488. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2009.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group. Participating units. Available from: http://www.sicsag.scot.nhs.uk/about/participants.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2016.

MeSH terms