Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Nov;66(652):e838-e847.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687553. Epub 2016 Oct 10.

Prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences in blood pressure for different primary care populations: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences in blood pressure for different primary care populations: systematic review and meta-analysis

Christopher E Clark et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Various prevalence figures have been reported for inter-arm differences in blood pressure (IAD); variation may be explained by differing population vascular risk and by measurement method.

Aim: To review the literature to derive robust estimates of IAD prevalence relevant to community populations.

Design and setting: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Method: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for cross-sectional studies likely to represent general or primary care populations, reporting prevalence of IAD and employing a simultaneous method of measurement. Using study-level data, pooled estimates of mean prevalence of systolic IADs were calculated and compared using a random effects model.

Results: Eighty IAD studies were identified. Sixteen met inclusion criteria: pooled estimates of prevalence for systolic IAD ≥10 mmHg were 11.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.1 to 13.6) in hypertension, 7.4% (95% CI = 5.8 to 9.2) in diabetes, and 3.6% (95% CI = 2.3 to 5.0) for a general adult population (P<0.001 for subgroup differences). Differences persisted for higher cut-off values. Prevalences were lower for East Asian than for Western populations and were overestimated by sequential measurement where this could be compared with simultaneous measurement within studies (relative risk for IAD: 2.9 [95% CI = 2.1 to 4.1]). Studies with higher mean absolute systolic pressures had higher prevalences for a systolic IAD ≥10 mmHg (P = 0.04).

Conclusion: Prevalences of IADs rise in relation to underlying cardiovascular comorbidities of the population studied, and are overestimated threefold when sequential measurement is used. Population-specific variation in prevalences of IAD should be taken into account in delivering clinical care and in planning future studies.

Keywords: blood pressure determination; hypertension; inter-arm difference; prevalence; primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences ≥10 mmHg.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Study level association between mean systolic blood pressure and prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences ≥10 mmHg.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Funnel plot for prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences ≥10 mmHg.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fonseca-Reyes S, Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM, García de Alba-García JE, et al. Simultaneous blood pressure measurement in both arms in hypertensive and nonhypertensive adult patients. Blood Press Monit. 2012;17(4):149–154. - PubMed
    1. Clark CE, Campbell JL, Evans PH, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of the inter-arm blood pressure difference: a systematic review. J Hum Hypertens. 2006;20(12):923–931. - PubMed
    1. Clark CE, Campbell JL, Powell RJ, et al. The inter-arm blood pressure difference and peripheral vascular disease: cross-sectional study. Fam Pract. 2007;24(5):420–426. - PubMed
    1. Clark CE, Taylor RS, Shore AC, et al. The difference in blood pressure readings between arms and survival: primary care cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:e1327. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark CE, Greaves C, Evans PH, et al. The inter-arm blood pressure difference in type 2 diabetes: a barrier to effective management? Br J Gen Pract. 2009 doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420752. - DOI - PMC - PubMed