Prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences in blood pressure for different primary care populations: systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 27789511
- PMCID: PMC5072922
- DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687553
Prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences in blood pressure for different primary care populations: systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Various prevalence figures have been reported for inter-arm differences in blood pressure (IAD); variation may be explained by differing population vascular risk and by measurement method.
Aim: To review the literature to derive robust estimates of IAD prevalence relevant to community populations.
Design and setting: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Method: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for cross-sectional studies likely to represent general or primary care populations, reporting prevalence of IAD and employing a simultaneous method of measurement. Using study-level data, pooled estimates of mean prevalence of systolic IADs were calculated and compared using a random effects model.
Results: Eighty IAD studies were identified. Sixteen met inclusion criteria: pooled estimates of prevalence for systolic IAD ≥10 mmHg were 11.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.1 to 13.6) in hypertension, 7.4% (95% CI = 5.8 to 9.2) in diabetes, and 3.6% (95% CI = 2.3 to 5.0) for a general adult population (P<0.001 for subgroup differences). Differences persisted for higher cut-off values. Prevalences were lower for East Asian than for Western populations and were overestimated by sequential measurement where this could be compared with simultaneous measurement within studies (relative risk for IAD: 2.9 [95% CI = 2.1 to 4.1]). Studies with higher mean absolute systolic pressures had higher prevalences for a systolic IAD ≥10 mmHg (P = 0.04).
Conclusion: Prevalences of IADs rise in relation to underlying cardiovascular comorbidities of the population studied, and are overestimated threefold when sequential measurement is used. Population-specific variation in prevalences of IAD should be taken into account in delivering clinical care and in planning future studies.
Keywords: blood pressure determination; hypertension; inter-arm difference; prevalence; primary care.
© British Journal of General Practice 2016.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Prevalence and clinical implications of the inter-arm blood pressure difference: A systematic review.J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Dec;20(12):923-31. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002093. Epub 2006 Oct 12. J Hum Hypertens. 2006. PMID: 17036043
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
-
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280. Health Technol Assess. 2008. PMID: 18547499
-
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37254718 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.pub2. PMID: 11687058 Updated.
Cited by
-
Inter-arm Systolic Blood Pressure Difference in Physically Active, Adult Subjects.High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2018 Sep;25(3):303-307. doi: 10.1007/s40292-018-0269-9. Epub 2018 Jul 12. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2018. PMID: 30003528
-
Blood pressure measurement technique in clinical practice in the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde.J Hum Hypertens. 2025 Mar;39(3):205-209. doi: 10.1038/s41371-024-00984-5. Epub 2024 Dec 5. J Hum Hypertens. 2025. PMID: 39638870 Free PMC article.
-
The interarm blood pressure difference: Do we know enough yet?J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 May;19(5):462-465. doi: 10.1111/jch.12982. Epub 2017 Mar 14. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017. PMID: 28296043 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Blood pressure measurement: a call to arms.Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Nov;66(652):552-553. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687637. Br J Gen Pract. 2016. PMID: 27789487 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Prevalence of inter-arm blood pressure difference among young healthy adults: Results from a large cross-sectional study on 3235 participants.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Apr 20;77:103631. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103631. eCollection 2022 May. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022. PMID: 35638020 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fonseca-Reyes S, Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM, García de Alba-García JE, et al. Simultaneous blood pressure measurement in both arms in hypertensive and nonhypertensive adult patients. Blood Press Monit. 2012;17(4):149–154. - PubMed
-
- Clark CE, Campbell JL, Evans PH, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of the inter-arm blood pressure difference: a systematic review. J Hum Hypertens. 2006;20(12):923–931. - PubMed
-
- Clark CE, Campbell JL, Powell RJ, et al. The inter-arm blood pressure difference and peripheral vascular disease: cross-sectional study. Fam Pract. 2007;24(5):420–426. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous