Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;102(3):593-599.
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.145078. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

Evaluation of the Revised International Staging System in an independent cohort of unselected patients with multiple myeloma

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Revised International Staging System in an independent cohort of unselected patients with multiple myeloma

Efstathios Kastritis et al. Haematologica. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) was recently introduced in order to improve risk stratification over that provided by the widely used standard International Staging System. In addition to the parameters of the standard system, the R-ISS incorporates the presence of chromosomal abnormalities detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization [t(4;14), t(14;16) and del17p] and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase. The R-ISS was formulated on the basis of a large dataset of selected patients who had participated in clinical trials and has not been validated in an independent cohort of unselected patients. Thus, we evaluated the R-ISS in 475 consecutive, unselected patients, treated in a single center. Our patients were older and more often had severe renal dysfunction than those in the original publication on the R-ISS. As regards distribution by group, 18% had R-ISS-1, 64.5% R-ISS-2 and 18% R-ISS-3. According to R-ISS group, the 5-year survival rate was 77%, 53% and 19% for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3, respectively (P<0.001). The R-ISS could identify three groups with distinct outcomes among patients treated with or without autologous stem cell transplantation, among those treated with either bortezomib-based or immunomodulatory drug-based primary therapy and in patients ≤65, 66-75 or >75 years. However, in patients with severe renal dysfunction the distinction between groups was less clear. In conclusion, our data in consecutive, unselected patients, with differences in the characteristics and treatment approaches compared to the original International Myeloma Working Group cohort, verified that R-ISS is a robust tool for risk stratification of newly diagnosed patients with symptomatic myeloma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Survival outcomes in 475 patients according to R-ISS group. (A) Progression-free survival (PFS) and (B) overall survival.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Survival of patients of different age groups according to R-ISS stage. (A) Patients ≤65 years, (B) patients 66–75 years, and (C) patients ≥76 years.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Survival according to the R-ISS for patients who did or did not receive ASCT and depending on first-line treatment regimen. (A) Patients treated with first-line regimens based on bortezomib (B) Patients treated with first-line regimens based on immunomodulatory drugs (IMID). (C) Patients who did not receive high-dose melphalan autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT). (D) Patients who received HDM-ASCT.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Overall survival according to R-ISS stage in patients categorized by renal fuction. (A) Patients with eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2. (B) Patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2

References

    1. Durie BG, Salmon SE. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer. 1975;36(3): 842–854. - PubMed
    1. Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3412–3420. - PubMed
    1. Fonseca R, Barlogie B, Bataille R, et al. Genetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: a workshop report. Cancer Res. 2004;64(4):1546–1558. - PubMed
    1. Munshi NC, Anderson KC, Bergsagel PL, et al. Consensus recommendations for risk stratification in multiple myeloma: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 2. Blood. 2011;117(18): 4696–4700. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corre J, Avet-Loiseau H. The impact of genomics on the management of myeloma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011;9(10):1200–1206. - PubMed