Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct 13:7:1573.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01573. eCollection 2016.

Microorganisms in Confined Habitats: Microbial Monitoring and Control of Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, Cleanrooms and the International Space Station

Affiliations
Review

Microorganisms in Confined Habitats: Microbial Monitoring and Control of Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, Cleanrooms and the International Space Station

Maximilian Mora et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Indoor environments, where people spend most of their time, are characterized by a specific microbial community, the indoor microbiome. Most indoor environments are connected to the natural environment by high ventilation, but some habitats are more confined: intensive care units, operating rooms, cleanrooms and the international space station (ISS) are extraordinary living and working areas for humans, with a limited exchange with the environment. The purposes for confinement are different: a patient has to be protected from infections (intensive care unit, operating room), product quality has to be assured (cleanrooms), or confinement is necessary due to extreme, health-threatening outer conditions, as on the ISS. The ISS represents the most secluded man-made habitat, constantly inhabited by humans since November 2000 - and, inevitably, also by microorganisms. All of these man-made confined habitats need to be microbiologically monitored and controlled, by e.g., microbial cleaning and disinfection. However, these measures apply constant selective pressures, which support microbes with resistance capacities against antibiotics or chemical and physical stresses and thus facilitate the rise of survival specialists and multi-resistant strains. In this article, we summarize the available data on the microbiome of aforementioned confined habitats. By comparing the different operating, maintenance and monitoring procedures as well as microbial communities therein, we emphasize the importance to properly understand the effects of confinement on the microbial diversity, the possible risks represented by some of these microorganisms and by the evolution of (antibiotic) resistances in such environments - and the need to reassess the current hygiene standards.

Keywords: built environment; confined habitat; indoor; microbiome; microorganisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Graphical display of the confined habitats addressed in this review. Outer rings summarize environmental conditions of the purpose for confinement, some characteristics of each confined environment and overall maintenance and preventive measures in respective built environments. Potential contamination and infection sources are highlighted by small graphics. Inner circle: Bacillus spores, scanning electron micrograph.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The microbial network visualizes microbial profiles of selected confined habitats based on a range of isolates obtained from these environments. The network was arranged with Cytoscape using a spring-embedded algorithm on eweights. Diversity of isolates on genus level was correlated with node size. Nodes and edges were colored by color mixtures of their respective environments: international space station (ISS) – yellow, intensive care units (ICU) – green, cleanrooms (CR) – blue, and operating rooms (OR) – red. Edge width and opacity was correlated to respective eweights, which were computed in QIIME (Caporaso et al., 2012).

References

    1. Adler A., Gottesman G., Dolfin T., Arnon S., Regev R., Bauer S., et al. (2005). Bacillus species sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit. J. Infec. 51 390–395. 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.12.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agodi A., Barchitta M., Cipresso R., Giaquinta L., Romeo M. A., Denaro C. (2007). Pseudomonas aeruginosa carriage, colonization, and infection in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 33 1155–1161. 10.1007/s00134-007-0671-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al Laham N. A. (2012). Prevalence of bacterial contamination in general operating theaters in selected hospitals in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. J. Infect. Public Health 5 43–51. 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.10.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alekhova T., Aleksandrova A., Novozhilova T. Y., Lysak L., Zagustina N., Bezborodov A. (2005). Monitoring of microbial degraders in manned space stations. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 41 382–389. 10.1007/s10438-005-0065-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alekhova T. A., Zakharchuk L. M., Tatarinova N. Y., Kadnikov V. V., Mardanov A. V., Ravin N. V., et al. (2016). Diversity of bacteria of the genus Bacillus on board of international space station. Dokl. Biochem. Biophys. 465 347–350. 10.1134/s1607672915060010 - DOI - PubMed