Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;10(9):FC04-FC06.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21955.8457. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

Evaluation of Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Treatment with Warfarin in Tehran, Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Evaluation of Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Treatment with Warfarin in Tehran, Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study

Bahram-Fariborz Farsad et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Anticoagulant control is assessed by Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR). For a given patient, TTR is defined as the duration of time in which the patient's International Normalized Ratio (INR) values were within a desired range.

Aim: To assess TTR in patients receiving treatment with warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation at a referral center for cardiovascular diseases in Tehran, Iran.

Materials and method: Over 6 months, we enrolled eligible patients presenting to Shaheed Rajaie Hospital in Tehran for regular INR testing. Demographic data, medical history, and current medications were determined for all participants. TTR was assessed by the Rosendaal method.

Results: A total of 470 patients (mean age 58.0±14.2 years, 60.2% women) underwent 1450 INR measurements. The mean TTR was calculated as 54.9±11.9%. Of the sample patients, 37.3% were in the good control category (TTR > 70%), 24.6% were in the intermediate category (50% < TTR < 70%), and 38.1% were in the poor control category (TTR < 50%). The number of current medications above four was a significant predictor of poor control (OR = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.87, 2.23). The mean TTR of the studied patients (54.9%) was below the good control range.

Conclusion: The quality of anticoagulant therapy with warfarin in Iranian patients was poorer than that reported in European countries. Based on these results, research considering the causes of poor TTR among Iranian patients is recommended.

Keywords: Anticoagulant; International Normalized Ratio; Iranian patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pirmohamed M. Warfarin: almost 60-year-old and still causing problems. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62:509–11. PMID:17061959. - PMC - PubMed
    1. You JH. Novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin therapy at various levels of anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2014;29:438–46. PMID:24132628. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farsad BF, Golpira R, Najafi H, Totonchi Z, Salajegheh S, Bakhshandeh H, et al. Comparison between prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) for the urgent reversal of warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves in a tertiary care cardiac center. Iran J Pharm Res. 2015;14:877–85. PMID:3938255. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E, Jacobson A, Crowther M, Palareti G, et al. Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest. 2008;133(6 Suppl):160S. PMID:18574279. - PubMed
    1. Hylek EM, Go AS, Chang Y, et al. Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation on stroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1019–26. PMID:12968085. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources