A Randomized Controlled Study to Compare Conventional and Evidence Based Treatment Protocols in Fresh Compound Fractures
- PMID: 27790530
- PMCID: PMC5072030
- DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19234.8405
A Randomized Controlled Study to Compare Conventional and Evidence Based Treatment Protocols in Fresh Compound Fractures
Abstract
Introduction: A recent concept review in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS) outlines evidence to control peri-operative infections in compound fractures. However, evidence for impact of adopting a protocol combining measures that have some evidence is lacking in literature. The present method of treatment at King George's Medical University (KGMU) is representative of the conventional practice of managing compound fractures in India and is an appropriate control for trial against the Experimental Evidence Based Protocol (EBP).
Aim: To study the additional impact of adopting Evidence Based Protocol on parameters defining infection rate and bone union.
Materials and methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted at the orthopaedics department of KGMU. Two hundred and twenty six patients of compound fractures of both bone leg, age > 12y were randomized to two groups. One group received standard treatment and the experimental group received treatment as per JBJS review.
Statistical analysis: Random allocation was tested by comparing baseline characteristics of the two groups. The two groups were compared for all the outcome variables in terms of time to a negative wound culture, time to wound healing, time to union at fracture site and time to achieve complete range of motion at knee joint.
Results: Random allocation was successful. EBP group reported significantly lesser time to a negative culture report from wound (mean in conventional=4.619, experimental=1.9146, p=0.0006), lesser time to bony union (mean in conventional=23.8427 weeks, experimental=22.8125 weeks, p=0.0027), lesser time to wound healing (mean in conventional=14.4425 weeks experimental=10.4513 weeks, p=0.0032), and a lesser duration of hospital stay (mean in conventional=6.5982 days, experimental=4.5000 days, p=0.0343).
Conclusion: EBP based on the guidelines suggested by Fletcher et al., significantly shorten the time taken for achieving a negative culture and hasten wound and fracture healing. Therefore EBP is recommended for use in settings like the KGMU trauma center.
Keywords: Culture; Fracture; Infection; Occlusive dressing; Povidone iodine; Wound.
Similar articles
-
Negative-pressure wound therapy compared with standard dressings following surgical treatment of major trauma to the lower limb: the WHiST RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Aug;24(38):1-86. doi: 10.3310/hta24380. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32821038 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(3):1-203. Epub 2009 Jul 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009. PMID: 23074533 Free PMC article.
-
[Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty using a locking compression plate].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Dec;76(6):473-8. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009. PMID: 20067694 Czech.
-
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9. Trials. 2020. PMID: 33115543 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous pinning for treating distal radial fractures in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 7;2(2):CD006080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006080.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32032439 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Timing of antibiotic administration, wound debridement, and the stages of reconstructive surgery for open long bone fractures of the upper and lower limbs.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD013555. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013555.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35363374 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(4):453–58. - PubMed
-
- Patzakis MJ, Wilkins J, Moore TM. Considerations in reducing the infection rate in open tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;(178):36–41. - PubMed
-
- Fletcher N, Sofianos D, Berkes MB, Obremskey WT. Prevention of perioperative infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(7):1605–18. - PubMed
-
- Mauerhan DR, Nelson CL, Smith DL, Fitzgerald RH, Slama TG, Petty RW, et al. Prophylaxis against infection in total joint arthroplasty. One day of cefuroxime compared with three days of cefazolin. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:39–45. - PubMed
-
- Auerbach AD. Prevention of surgical site infections. In: Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, editors. Making health care safer: a critical analysisof patient safety practices. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 43. AHRQpublication no. 01-E058. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 20 July 2001. p 221-44. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/pdf/ptsafety.pdf. Accessed 2016 May 15.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources