Comparison of Stress Distribution in a Maxillary Central Incisor Restored with Two Prefabricated Post Systems with and without Ferrule Using Finite Element Method
- PMID: 27790580
- PMCID: PMC5072080
- DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19443.8492
Comparison of Stress Distribution in a Maxillary Central Incisor Restored with Two Prefabricated Post Systems with and without Ferrule Using Finite Element Method
Abstract
Introduction: When restoring an endodontically treated tooth with deficient coronal tooth structure, posts can be used to strengthen the tooth. Recently prefabricated posts are widely used as they exclude the need for complex laboratory procedures making the procedure time saving. But the post-placement can produce stresses that cause root fracture. Different techniques can be used to study the stress distribution due to different posts, but most of them are two-dimensional and difficult to reproduce.
Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor with Titanium and Glass fiber posts with and without ferrule using the three dimensional finite element analysis.
Materials and methods: In this study 3D finite element analysis was used. Four models P1(Endodontically treated maxillary central incisor with a ferrule of coronal dentin and restored with parallel sided prefabricated titanium post and composite resin core), P2 (Endodontically treated maxillary central incisor restored with parallel sided prefabricated Titanium post and composite resin core without a ferrule of coronal dentin), P3 (Endodontically treated maxillary central incisor with a ferrule of coronal dentin and restored with parallel sided prefabricated glass fiber reinforced composite post and composite core), P4 (Endodontically treated maxillary central incisor restored with parallel sided prefabricated glass fiber reinforced composite post and composite core without a ferrule of coronal dentin), were modeled using PRO E software. Then stress analysis was done using ANSYS WORKBENCH 10.0software. A load of 100 N was applied to the models at 2mm from the incisal edge on the palatal surface with an angle of 45o to the long axis of the tooth.
Results: The results suggested that maximum stresses were seen around posts in order of Titanium post without ferrule followed by Titanium post with ferrule next Glass fiber post without ferrule followed by Glass fiber post with ferrule.
Conclusion: Stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor restored with titanium post is greater than when restored with glass fiber post. Stress distribution around posts is greater when a ferrule is not present.
Keywords: Boundary condition; Glass fiber post; Meshing; Titanium post.
Figures
References
-
- Lynch CD, Sullivan VRO, McGillycuddy CT. Pierre Fauchard: the “Father of Modern Dentistry”. Br Dent J. 2006;201(12):779–81. - PubMed
-
- Bateman G, Ricketts DN, Saunders WP. Fibre-based post systems: a review. Br Dent J. 2003;195(1):43–48. - PubMed
-
- Escribano AB, Sancho Bru JL, Navarro LF, Rodriquea CPJ, Perez GA, Scanchez MFT. Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: Fracture resistance and stress distribution. Oper Dent. 2006;31(1):47–54. - PubMed
-
- King PA, Setchell DJ. An in-vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 1990;17(6):599–09. - PubMed
-
- Tacir IH, Kama JD, Zortuk M, Eskirnez S. Flexural properties of glass fiber reinforced acrylic resin polymers. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(1):52–56. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources