Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 23;138(46):15251-15259.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b09936. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

Enzyme Architecture: Self-Assembly of Enzyme and Substrate Pieces of Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase into a Robust Catalyst of Hydride Transfer

Affiliations

Enzyme Architecture: Self-Assembly of Enzyme and Substrate Pieces of Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase into a Robust Catalyst of Hydride Transfer

Archie C Reyes et al. J Am Chem Soc. .

Abstract

The stabilization of the transition state for hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP due to the action of the phosphodianion of DHAP and the cationic side chain of R269 is between 12.4 and 17 kcal/mol. The R269A mutation of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (hlGPDH) results in a 9.1 kcal/mol destabilization of the transition state for enzyme-catalyzed reduction of dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) by NADH, and there is a 6.7 kcal/mol stabilization of this transition state by 1.0 M guanidine cation (Gua+) [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5312-5315]. The R269A mutant shows no detectable activity toward reduction of glycolaldehyde (GA), or activation of this reaction by 30 mM HPO32-. We report the unprecedented self-assembly of R269A hlGPDH, dianions (X2- = FPO32-, HPO32-, or SO42-), Gua+ and GA into a functioning catalyst of the reduction of GA, and fourth-order reaction rate constants kcat/KGAKXKGua. The linear logarithmic correlation (slope = 1.0) between values of kcat/KGAKX for dianion activation of wildtype hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA and kcat/KGAKXKGua shows that the electrostatic interaction between exogenous dianions and the side chain of R269 is not significantly perturbed by cutting hlGPDH into R269A and Gua+ pieces. The advantage for connection of hlGPDH (R269A mutant + Gua+) and substrate pieces (GA + HPi) pieces, (ΔGS)HPi+E+Gua = 5.6 kcal/mol, is nearly equal to the sum of the advantage to connection of the substrate pieces, (ΔGS)GA+HPi = 3.3 kcal/mol, for wildtype hlGPDH-catalyzed reaction of GA + HPi, and for connection of the enzyme pieces, (ΔGS)E+Gua = 2.4 kcal/mol, for Gua+ activation of the R269A hlGPDH-catalyzed reaction of DHAP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A comparison of the protein surfaces from X-ray crystal structures of the following: (A) The complex between OMPDC from yeast and 6-hydroxyuridine 5′-monophosphate (PDB entry 1DQX). (B) The nonproductive ternary complex of dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) and NAD+ with hlGPDH (PDP entry 1WPQ). These structures show the loops that trap the ligand in a protein cage shaded red, and the guanidine side chains at the protein surface shaded black. The respective enzyme-bound ligands at the structures represented by A and B are buried in the protein, with the phosphodianion projecting toward the surface, and in a stable ion pair with the guanidine side chains of R235 (OMPDC) or R269 (hlGPDH). Reproduced from ref (5a). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of inorganic dianions and Gua+ on R269A mutant hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA by NADH, determined for reactions at pH 7.5, 25 °C, saturating [NADH] = 0.2 mM and I = 0.12 (NaCl). (A) The increase in v/[E][GA] (M–1 s–1), with increasing [HPO32–], for reactions in the presence of 30 mM (open symbols) or 60 mM (closed symbols) total GA [carbonyl + hydrate] and at different fixed concentrations of Gua+. The equilibrium constant for hydration of GA is Keq = [carbonyl]/[hydrate] = (6/94). Key: ([GA]carbonyl = 3.6 mM) (▼) 30 mM Gua+; (⧫), 25 mM Gua+; (■), 20 mM Gua+; (▲), 15 mM Gua+; (●), 10 mM Gua+; ([GA]carbonyl = 1.8 mM) (□), 30 mM Gua+; (◊), 15 mM Gua+. (B) The increase in v/[E][GA] (M–1 s–1), with increasing [FPO32–], for reactions at [GA]carbonyl = 3.6 mM and at different fixed concentrations of Gua+. Key: (▼) 30 mM Gua+; (⧫), 25 mM Gua+; (■), 20 mM Gua+; (▲), 15 mM Gua+; (●), 10 mM Gua+. (C) The increase in v/[E][GA] (M–1 s–1), with increasing [SO42–], for reactions at 3.6 mM GA and at different fixed concentrations of Gua+. Key: (▼) 30 mM Gua+; (⧫), 25 mM Gua+; (■), 20 mM Gua+; (▲), 15 mM Gua+; (●), 10 mM Gua+. Figure 3 shows the linear plots of the slopes of these linear correlations, (kcat/KGAKX)obs, against [Gua+].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of increasing concentrations of Gua+ on the observed third-order rate constants (kcat/KGAKX)obs (M–2 s–1, Figure 2) for dianion activation of R269A mutant hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA: solid symbols, [GA]carbonyl = 3.6 mM; open symbols, [GA]carbonyl = 1.8 mM. The slopes of these linear correlations are the fourth order rate constants kcat/KGAKXKGua reported in Table 1.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
Scheme 6
Scheme 6
Scheme 7
Scheme 7
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Representations of the X-ray crystal structure (PDB entry 1WPQ) of the nonproductive ternary Michaelis complex between wildtype hlGPDH, DHAP and NAD+. (B–D) Representations, generated in silico from Figure 4A by deletion of the relevant covalent linkage(s) and maintaining a fixed position for the remaining atoms, of the following hypothetical Michaelis complexes: (B) wildtype hlGPDH, GA and HPi, (C) R269A hlGPDH, DHAP and Gua+, (D) R269A hlGPDH, GA, HPi and Gua+.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Linear logarithmic correlation, with slope of 1.0, between the fourth order rate constants kcat/KGAKXKGua for activation of R269A hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA by the combined action of dianions X2– and Gua+ and the third order rate constants kcat/KGAKX for activation of wildtype hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA by the same dianions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lasker K.; Förster F.; Bohn S.; Walzthoeni T.; Villa E.; Unverdorben P.; Beck F.; Aebersold R.; Sali A.; Baumeister W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 1380–1387. 10.1073/pnas.1120559109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lehn J.-M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 1304–1319. 10.1002/anie.199013041. - DOI
    2. Lawrence D. S.; Jiang T.; Levett M. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2229–2260. 10.1021/cr00038a018. - DOI
    1. Grzelczak M.; Vermant J.; Furst E. M.; Liz-Marzán L. M. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3591–3605. 10.1021/nn100869j. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peracchi A. Curr. Chem. Biol. 2008, 2, 32–49. 10.2174/187231308783334162. - DOI
    1. Reyes A. C.; Koudelka A. P.; Amyes T. L.; Richard J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5312–5315. 10.1021/jacs.5b02202. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    2. Go M. K.; Amyes T. L.; Richard J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13525–13532. 10.1021/ja106104h. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    3. Barnett S. A.; Amyes T. L.; Wood M. B.; Gerlt J. A.; Richard J. P. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 824–826. 10.1021/bi902174q. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    4. Olucha J.; Meneely K. M.; Lamb A. L. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 7525–7532. 10.1021/bi300472n. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances