Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 27;61(1):e01763-16.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01763-16. Print 2017 Jan.

Pharmacodynamics of Aerosolized Fosfomycin and Amikacin against Resistant Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model: Experimental Basis for Combination Therapy

Affiliations

Pharmacodynamics of Aerosolized Fosfomycin and Amikacin against Resistant Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model: Experimental Basis for Combination Therapy

Fekade Bruck Sime et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

There has been a resurgence of interest in aerosolization of antibiotics for treatment of patients with severe pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. A combination formulation of amikacin-fosfomycin is currently undergoing clinical testing although the exposure-response relationships of these drugs have not been fully characterized. The aim of this study was to describe the individual and combined antibacterial effects of simulated epithelial lining fluid exposures of aerosolized amikacin and fosfomycin against resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MICs of 16 mg/liter and 64 mg/liter) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MICs of 2 mg/liter and 64 mg/liter) using a dynamic hollow-fiber infection model over 7 days. Targeted peak concentrations of 300 mg/liter amikacin and/or 1,200 mg/liter fosfomycin as a 12-hourly dosing regimens were used. Quantitative cultures were performed to describe changes in concentrations of the total and resistant bacterial populations. The targeted starting inoculum was 108 CFU/ml for both strains. We observed that neither amikacin nor fosfomycin monotherapy was bactericidal against P. aeruginosa while both were associated with rapid amplification of resistant P. aeruginosa strains (about 108 to 109 CFU/ml within 24 to 48 h). For K. pneumoniae, amikacin but not fosfomycin was bactericidal. When both drugs were combined, a rapid killing was observed for P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae (6-log kill within 24 h). Furthermore, the combination of amikacin and fosfomycin effectively suppressed growth of resistant strains of P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae In conclusion, the combination of amikacin and fosfomycin was effective at maximizing bacterial killing and suppressing emergence of resistance against these clinical isolates.

Keywords: multidrug resistance; nebulized; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Observed concentration-time profiles of amikacin and fosfomycin during the first dosing interval.
FIG 2
FIG 2
The effect of amikacin-fosfomycin combination therapy on the density of the total bacterial population of a P. aeruginosa clinical isolate (PA SAT 290) in an HFIM simulating pharmacokinetic decay of peak concentrations of 300 mg/liter amikacin–1,200 mg/liter fosfomycin in comparison with growth with monotherapy with each antibiotic.
FIG 3
FIG 3
The effect of amikacin-fosfomycin combination therapy on the density of resistant bacterial populations of a P. aeruginosa clinical isolate (PA SAT 290) in an HFIM simulating pharmacokinetic decay of peak concentrations of 300 mg/liter amikacin–1,200 mg/liter fosfomycin in comparison with growth with monotherapy with each antibiotic.
FIG 4
FIG 4
The effect of amikacin-fosfomycin combination therapy on the density of the total bacterial population of a K. pneumoniae clinical isolate (K.p. 301) in an HFIM simulating pharmacokinetic decay of peak concentrations of 300 mg/liter amikacin–1,200 mg/liter fosfomycin in comparison with growth with monotherapy with each antibiotic.
FIG 5
FIG 5
The effect of amikacin-fosfomycin combination therapy on the density of resistant bacterial populations of a K. pneumoniae clinical isolate (K.p. 301) in an HFIM simulating pharmacokinetic decay of peak concentrations of 300 mg/liter amikacin–1,200 mg/liter fosfomycin in comparison with growth with monotherapy with each antibiotic.

References

    1. Rodvold KA, Yoo L, George JM. 2011. Penetration of anti-infective agents into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid: focus on antifungal, antitubercular and miscellaneous anti-infective agents. Clin Pharmacokinet 50:1–8. doi:10.2165/11592900-000000000-00000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jamal JA, Abdul-Aziz MH, Lipman J, Roberts JA. 2013. Defining antibiotic dosing in lung infections. Clin Pulm Med 20:121–128. doi:10.1097/CPM.0b013e31828fc646. - DOI
    1. Quon BS, Goss CH, Ramsey BW. 2014. Inhaled antibiotics for lower airway infections. Ann Am Thorac Soc 11:425–434. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201311-395FR. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kollef MH, Hamilton CW, Montgomery AB. 2013. Aerosolized antibiotics: do they add to the treatment of pneumonia? Curr Opin Infect Dis 26:538–544. doi:10.1097/QCO.0000000000000004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Montgomery AB, Vallance S, Abuan T, Tservistas M, Davies A. 2014. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled dose-escalation phase 1 study of aerosolized amikacin and fosfomycin delivered via the PARI investigational eFlow inline nebulizer system in mechanically ventilated patients. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 27:441–448. doi:10.1089/jamp.2013.1100. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources