Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 7;5(1):1751.
doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3445-1. eCollection 2016.

Personal and related kinds of proximity driving collaborations: a multi-case study of Dutch nanotechnology researchers

Claudia Werker  1 , Ward Ooms  2 , Marjolein C J Caniëls  2
Affiliations

Personal and related kinds of proximity driving collaborations: a multi-case study of Dutch nanotechnology researchers

Claudia Werker et al. Springerplus. .

Abstract

Previous studies investigating proximity and collaboration have not clarified personal elements, such as working or communication style. Here, we show that personal proximity-close similarity in terms of personal traits and behavioral patterns-substantially affects the whole life cycle of research collaborations. We conduct a multi-case study of Dutch nanotechnology researchers. We select our interviewees through a bibliometric analysis and focus on the most central Dutch nanotechnology researchers in the global network. Our results reveal that social proximity and temporary geographical proximity have indirect effects enabling potential partners to assess their personal proximity. Sufficient levels of personal proximity often make or break the deal, provided that partners' cognitive and organizational proximity-which are major drivers of research collaborations-suffice. Introducing personal proximity to analyze research collaborations puts previous findings on proximity dimensions' effect on collaboration in a new perspective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dimensions of proximity affecting collaboration formation, process, outcomes and continuation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Amin A, Cohendet P. Geographies of knowledge formation in firms. Ind Innov. 2005;12(4):465–486. doi: 10.1080/13662710500381658. - DOI
    1. Arora SK, Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P. Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics. 2013;95(1):351–370. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0903-6. - DOI
    1. Audretsch D, Feldman M. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev. 1996;86(3):630–640.
    1. Autant-Bernard C, Billand P, Frachisse D, Massard N. Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies*. Pap Reg Sci. 2007;86(3):495–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00132.x. - DOI
    1. Balland P-A. Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) industry. Reg Stud. 2012;46(6):741–756. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.529121. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources