Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships
- PMID: 27796609
- PMCID: PMC5306274
- DOI: 10.1007/s10519-016-9825-z
Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships
Abstract
We compared the nature of the sibling relationship in dyads of varying genetic relatedness, employing a behavioural genetic design to estimate the contribution that genes and the environment have on this familial bond. Two samples were used-the Sisters and Brothers Study consisted of 173 families with two target non-twin children (mean ages = 7.42 and 5.22 years respectively); and the Twins, Family and Behaviour study included 234 families with two target twin children (mean age = 4.70 years). Mothers and fathers reported on their children's relationship with each other, via a postal questionnaire (the Sisters and Brothers Study) or a telephone interview (the Twins, Family and Behaviour study). Contrary to expectations, no mean level differences emerged when monozygotic twin pairs, dizygotic twin pairs, and non-twin pairs were compared on their sibling relationship quality. Behavioural genetic analyses also revealed that the sibling bond was modestly to moderately influenced by the genetic propensities of the children within the dyad, and moderately to substantially influenced by the shared environment common to both siblings. In addition, for sibling negativity, we found evidence of twin-specific environmental influence-dizygotic twins showed more reciprocity than did non-twins. Our findings have repercussions for the broader application of results from future twin-based investigations.
Keywords: Behaviour genetics; Sibling relationship quality; Siblings; Twins.
Conflict of interest statement
Katharine M. Mark, Alison Pike, Rachel M. Latham and Bonamy R. Oliver declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ethical Approval All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Human and Animal Rights This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. Informed Consent Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Figures

References
-
- Abramovitch R, Corter C, Lando B. Sibling interaction in the home. Child Dev. 1979;50:997–1003. doi: 10.2307/1129325. - DOI
-
- Abramovitch R, Corter C, Pepler D, Stanhope L. Sibling and peer interaction: a final follow-up and a comparison. Child Dev. 1986;57:217–229. doi: 10.2307/1130653. - DOI
-
- Bowen M. Family therapy in clinical practice. Northvale: Jason Aronson; 1978.
-
- Brody GH. Siblings’ direct and indirect contributions to child development. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2004;13:124–126. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00289.x. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources