Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 18;6(10):e010466.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010466.

What factors predict length of stay in a neonatal unit: a systematic review

Affiliations

What factors predict length of stay in a neonatal unit: a systematic review

Sarah E Seaton et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: In the UK, 1 in 10 babies require specialist neonatal care. This care can last from hours to months depending on the need of the baby. The increasing survival of very preterm babies has increased neonatal care resource use. Evidence from multiple studies is crucial to identify factors which may be important for predicting length of stay (LOS). The ability to predict LOS is vital for resource planning, decision-making and parent counselling. The objective of this review was to identify which factors are important to consider when predicting LOS in the neonatal unit.

Design: A systematic review was undertaken which searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus for papers from 1994 to 2016 (May) for research investigating prediction of neonatal LOS. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Quality of each study was discussed, but not used as a reason for exclusion from the review.

Main outcome measure: Prediction of LOS in the neonatal unit.

Results: 9 studies were identified which investigated the prediction of neonatal LOS indicating a lack of evidence in the area. Inherent factors, particularly birth weight, sex and gestational age allow for a simple and objective prediction of LOS, which can be calculated on the first day of life. However, other early occurring factors may well also be important and estimates may need revising throughout the baby's stay in hospital.

Conclusions: Predicting LOS is vital to aid the commissioning of services and to help clinicians in their counselling of parents. The lack of evidence in this area indicates a need for larger studies to investigate methods of accurately predicting LOS.

Keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY; NEONATOLOGY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart documenting the results of the systematic review search. This review focuses on the articles identified which investigated the prediction of LOS. LOS, length of stay; OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), Quality Standards Programme. NICE cost impact and commissioning assessment: quality standard for specialist neonatal care 2010. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs4
    1. Field DJ, Dorling JS, Manktelow BN et al. . Survival of extremely premature babies in a geographically defined population: prospective cohort study of 1994-9 compared with 2000-5. BMJ 2008;336:1221–3. 10.1136/bmj.39555.670718.BE - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hintz SR, Poole WK, Wright LL et al. . Changes in mortality and morbidities among infants born at less than 25 weeks during the post-surfactant era. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:F128–33. 10.1136/adc.2003.046268 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD: better policies for better lives . 2014. http://www.oecd.org
    1. University of York Centre for Reviews Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2009.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources