Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 24;6(10):e012244.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012244.

Why do general practitioners prescribe antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections to meet patient expectations: a mixed methods study

Affiliations

Why do general practitioners prescribe antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections to meet patient expectations: a mixed methods study

Stephanie Fletcher-Lartey et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the role patient expectations play in general practitioners (GPs) antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections (URTI).

Methods: Concurrent explanatory mixed methods approach using a cross-sectional survey and semistructured interviews.

Settings: Primary care GPs in Australia.

Participants: 584 GPs (response rate of 23.6%) completed the cross-sectional survey. 32 GPs were interviewed individually.

Outcome measure: Prescribing of antibiotics for URTI.

Results: More than half the GP respondents to the survey in Australia self-reported that they would prescribe antibiotics for an URTI to meet patient expectations. Our qualitative findings suggest that 'patient expectations' may be the main reason given for inappropriate prescribing, but it is an all-encompassing phrase that includes other reasons. These include limited time, poor doctor-patient communication and diagnostic uncertainty. We have identified three role archetypes to explain the behaviour of GPs in reference to antibiotic prescribing for URTIs. The main themes emerging from the qualitative component was that many GPs did not think that antibiotic prescribing in primary care was responsible for the development of antibiotic resistance nor that their individual prescribing would make any difference in light of other bigger issues like hospital prescribing or veterinary use. For them, there were negligible negative consequences from their inappropriate prescribing.

Conclusions: There is a need to increase awareness of the scope and magnitude of antibiotic resistance and the role primary care prescribing plays, and of the contribution of individual prescribing decisions to the problem of antibiotic resistance.

Keywords: PRIMARY CARE; antibiotics; inappropriate prescribing; upper respiratory tract infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Qualitative study logistics. GP, general practitioner.

References

    1. SCRGSP (Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision). Report on Government Services 2015. Canberra: Health, Productivity Commission, 2015.
    1. Sung L, Arroll J, Arroll B et al. Antibiotic use for upper respiratory tract infections before and after a education campaign as reported by general practitioners in New Zealand. N Z Med J 2006;119:U1956. - PubMed
    1. Mangione-Smith R, Elliott MN, Stivers T et al. Ruling out the need for antibiotics: are we sending the right message? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:945–52. 10.1001/archpedi.160.9.945 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauchner H, Pelton SI, Klein JO. Parents, physicians, and antibiotic use. Pediatrics 1999;103:395–401. 10.1542/peds.103.2.395 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Little P, Williamson I, Warner G et al. Open randomised trial of prescribing strategies in managing sore throat. BMJ 1997;314:722–7. 10.1136/bmj.314.7082.722 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances