Functionalism cannot save the classical view of emotion
- PMID: 27798259
- PMCID: PMC5390699
- DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw156
Functionalism cannot save the classical view of emotion
Comment in
-
Reply to Barrett: affective neuroscience needs objective criteria for emotions.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jan 1;12(1):32-33. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw155. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 27798258 Free PMC article.
Comment on
-
How should neuroscience study emotions? by distinguishing emotion states, concepts, and experiences.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jan 1;12(1):24-31. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw153. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 27798256 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Anderson M.L. (2014). After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
-
- Barrett L.F. (2017). How Emotions are made: The Secret Life the Brain. New York: Houghton-Mifflin-Harcourt.
-
- Faulkner W. (1975). Requiem for a Nun. New York: Random House.
-
- Keleman D., Rottman J., Seston R. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1074–83. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources