Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 17:7:1508.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01508. eCollection 2016.

Does Language Matter? Exploring Chinese-Korean Differences in Holistic Perception

Affiliations

Does Language Matter? Exploring Chinese-Korean Differences in Holistic Perception

Ann K Rhode et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Cross-cultural research suggests that East Asians display a holistic attentional bias by paying attention to the entire field and to relationships between objects, whereas Westerners pay attention primarily to salient objects, displaying an analytic attentional bias. The assumption of a universal pan-Asian holistic attentional bias has recently been challenged in experimental research involving Japanese and Chinese participants, which suggests that linguistic factors may contribute to the formation of East Asians' holistic attentional patterns. The present experimental research explores differences in attention and information processing styles between Korean and Chinese speakers, who have been assumed to display the same attentional bias due to cultural commonalities. We hypothesize that the specific structure of the Korean language predisposes speakers to pay more attention to ground information than to figure information, thus leading to a stronger holistic attentional bias compared to Chinese speakers. Findings of the present research comparing different groups of English, Chinese, and Korean speakers provide further evidence for differences in East Asians' holistic attentional bias, which may be due to the influence of language. Furthermore, we also extend prior theorizing by discussing the potential impact of other cultural factors. In line with critical voices calling for more research investigating differences between cultures that are assumed to be culturally similar, we highlight important avenues for future studies exploring the language-culture relationship.

Keywords: attention; culture; language; linguistic relativity; replication; thinking for speaking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bar diagram showing the mean number of ground information mentioned by English, Chinese, and Korean participants in the picture description task. Korean participants reported the highest overall number of ground information, followed by Chinese participants, and English participants.

References

    1. Altmann G., Kamide Y. (2004). Now you see it, now you don't: mediating the mapping between language and the visual world, in The Interface Between Language, Vision and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World, eds Henderson J., Ferreira F.(New York, NY: Psychology Press; ), 347–385.
    1. Barsalou L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617–645. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bock K., Irwin D., Davidson D. J. (2004). Putting first things first, in The Interface Between Language, Vision and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World, eds Henderson J., Ferreira F.(New York, NY: Psychology Press; ), 249–278.
    1. Boland J. E., Chua H. F., Nisbett R. E. (2008). How we see it: culturally different eye movement patterns over visual scenes, in Cognitive and Cultural Influences on Eye Movements, eds Rayner K., Shen D., Bai X., Yan G.(Tianjin: Tianjin People's Publishing House; ), 363–378.
    1. Borghi A. M., Pecher D. (2012). Introduction to the special topic embodied and grounded cognition. Front. Psychol. 2:187. 10.3389/978-2-88919-013-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources