Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 28;5(1):5586.
doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2016.5586. eCollection 2016 Jan 18.

Meat Juice Serology for Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Chickens

Affiliations

Meat Juice Serology for Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Chickens

Alice Vismarra et al. Ital J Food Saf. .

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii is an important foodborne zoonosis. Free-range chickens are at particularly high risk of infection and are also excellent indicators of soil contamination by oocysts. In the present study, hearts of 77 free-range chickens were collected at slaughter. T. gondii meat juice enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed with a commercial kit, following validation with positive controls, from experimentally infected chickens, and negative ones. Out of 77 samples, only 66 gave sufficient meat juice for serology. Of these, 24 (36.4%) were positive for T. gondii considering the 5*standard deviation values (calculated on the optical density of negative controls), while all the samples were negative considering sample/positive% values. Parasite-specific polymerase chain reaction was carried out on all samples obtained from heart tissue and none were positive for the presence of T. gondii DNA. Results would suggest that further study on the use of meat juice with a validated serological test to detect T. gondii in chickens could lead to widespread epidemiological studies in this important intermediate host. However, sample collection and test specificity require further evaluation.

Keywords: ELISA; Meat juice; Serology; Toxoplasma gondii.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

the authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bacci C, Vismarra A, Mangia C, Bonardi S, Bruini I, Genchi M, Kramer L, Brindani F, 2015. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in free-range, organic pigs in Italy using serological and molecular methods. Int J Food Microbiol 202:54-6. - PubMed
    1. Basso W, Hartnack S, Pardini L, Maksimov P, Koudela B, Venturini MC, Schares G, Sidler X, Lewis FI, Deplazes P, 2013. Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of a commercial ELISA for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pigs compared with IFAT, TgSAG1-ELISA and Western blot, using a Bayesian latent class approach. Int J Parasitol 43:565-70. - PubMed
    1. Berger-Schoch AE, Bernet D, Doherr MG, Gottstein B, Frey CF, 2011. Toxoplasma gondii in Switzerland: a serosurvey based on meat juice analysis of slaughtered pigs, wild boar, sheep and cattle. Zoonoses Public Hlth 58:472-8. - PubMed
    1. Burg JL, Grover CM, Pouletty P, Boothroyd JC, 1989. Direct and sensitive detection of a pathogenic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii, by Polymerase Chain Reaction. J Clin Microbiol 27:1787-92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casartelli-Alves L, Boechat VC, Macedo-Couto R, Ferreira LC, Nicolau JL, Neves LB, Millar PR, Vicente RT, Oliveira RV, Muniz AG, Bonna IC, Amendoeira MR, Silva RC, Langoni H, Schubach TM, Menezes RC, 2014. Sensitivity and specificity of serological tests, histopathology and immunohis-tochemistry for detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic chickens. Vet Parasitol 204:346-51. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources