Refractive and Aberration Outcomes after Customized Photorefractive Keratectomy in Comparison with Customized Femtosecond Laser
- PMID: 27800501
- PMCID: PMC5087100
Refractive and Aberration Outcomes after Customized Photorefractive Keratectomy in Comparison with Customized Femtosecond Laser
Abstract
To compare the refractive and visual outcomes and higher order aberrations in patients with low to moderate myopia who underwent customized photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (Femto-LASIK) this research performed. This study includes data of 120 consecutive eyes of 60 patients with myopia between -3.00 D and -7.00 D with or without astigmatism in two surgery groups: PRK and Femto-LASIK. Refractive, visual, and aberration outcomes of the two methods of surgery were compared after 6 months of follow-up. After six months of follow-up, sphere and cylinder were found significantly decreased and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The mean of uncorrected distance visual acuity in LogMar format for the PRK and Femto-LASIK groups was -0.03±0.07 and -0.01±0.08, respectively, which was not significantly different between the two groups. Higher orders and spherical aberrations increased in both groups significantly, while total aberrations decreased in both groups. After surgery, no differences were observed between the two groups in the amount of aberrations. In conclusion, Both PRK and Femto-LASIK are effective and safe in correcting myopia. In this study PRK induced more spherical and higher order aberrations than Femto-LASIK.
Keywords: Customized Femtosecond Laser; Customized Photorefractive Keratectomy; Myopia; Spherical Aberration.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Recovery of uncorrected visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia.Cornea. 2001 Mar;20(2):153-5. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200103000-00007. Cornea. 2001. PMID: 11248818
-
Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus PRK for high myopia: comparison of 18-month visual acuity and quality.Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;37(4):995-1001. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0364-7. Epub 2016 Oct 3. Int Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 27699605 Clinical Trial.
-
Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK Versus PRK: Comparison of 6-Month Visual Acuity and Quality Outcome for High Myopia.Eye Contact Lens. 2016 Nov;42(6):354-357. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000216. Eye Contact Lens. 2016. PMID: 26657666 Clinical Trial.
-
Myopia correction with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: One-year case-matched analysis.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Nov;42(11):1579-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.025. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016. PMID: 27956284
-
Laser Refractive Surgery for Vision Correction: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness [Internet].Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2018 Jun 22. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2018 Jun 22. PMID: 30379512 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
A Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Between Photorefractive Keratectomy and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis.Cureus. 2017 Sep 1;9(9):e1641. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1641. Cureus. 2017. PMID: 29119072 Free PMC article.
-
Control-matched comparison of refractive and visual outcomes between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 May 10;12:865-873. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S161883. eCollection 2018. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29785082 Free PMC article.
-
Customized eye modeling for optical quality assessment in myopic femto-LASIK surgery.Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 6;11(1):16049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95730-z. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34362982 Free PMC article.
-
Long Term Follow-Up Safety and Effectiveness of Myopia Refractive Surgery.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238729. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33255392 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jabbur NS, Sakatani K, O'Brien TP. Survey of complications and recommendations for management in dissatisfied patients seeking a consultation after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refrac Surg. 2004;30:1867–74. PMID: 15342048. - PubMed
-
- Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, Huang D, Varley GA, Agapitos PJ, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:175–87. PMID: 11772601. - PubMed
-
- Vengris M, Gabryte E, Aleknavicius A, Barkauskas M, Ruksenas O, Vaiceliunaite A, et al. Corneal shaping and ablation of transparent media by femtosecond pulses in deep ultraviolet range. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1579–87. PMID: 20692573. - PubMed
-
- Zhang Z-H, Jin H-Y, Suo Y, Patel SV, Montés-Micó R, Manche EE, et al. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(12):2151–9. PMID: 22108110. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources