Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov 1;5(11):623-630.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.102.

Values in Health Policy - A Concept Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Values in Health Policy - A Concept Analysis

Lida Shams et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the significant role "values" play in decision-making no definition or attributes regarding the concept have been provided in health policy-making. This study aimed to clarify the defining attributes of a concept of value and its irrelevant structures in health policy-making. We anticipate our findings will help reduce the semantic ambiguities associated with the use of "values" and other concepts such as principles, criteria, attitudes, and beliefs.

Methods: An extensive search of literature was carried out using electronic data base and library. The overall search strategy yielded about 1540 articles and 450 additional records. Based on traditional qualitative research, studies were purposefully selected and the coding of articles continued until data saturation was reached. Accordingly, 31 articles, 2 books, and 5 other documents were selected for the review. We applied Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis in studying the phenomenon. Definitions, applications, attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the concept of "value in health policy-making" were extracted. We also identified similarities and differences that exist between and within them.

Results: We identified eight major attributes of "value in health policy-making": ideological origin, affect one's choices, more resistant to change over time, source of motivation, ability to sacrifice one's interest, goal-oriented nature for community, trans-situational and subjectivity. Other features pinpointed include alternatives, antecedents, and consequences. Alternative, antecedents and consequences case may have more or fewer attributes or may lack one of these attributes and at the same time have other distinctive ones.

Conclusion: Despite the use of the value framework, ambiguities still persist in providing definition of the concept value in health policy-making. Understanding the concept of value in health policy-making may provide extra theoretical support to decision-makers in their policy-making process, to help avoid poor policy formulation and wastage of limited resources.

Keywords: Belief; Health; Ideology; Policy-Making; Principle; Values.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Strydom WF, Funke N, Nienaber S, Nortje K, Steyn M. Evidence-based policymaking: a review. S Afr J Sci. 2010;106(5-6):17–24. doi: 10.4102/sajs.v106i5/6.249. - DOI
    1. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Health Services Research and Evidence-Based Decision-Making. http://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/migrated/pdf/mythbusters/EBDM_e.pdf. Published 2000.
    1. Wood Bridge K, Fulford KW. Whose Values? A Workbook for Values-Based Practice in Mental Health Care. London, UK: The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health; 2004.
    1. Kehoe SM, Ponting JR. Value importance and value congruence as determinants of trust in health policy actors. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(6):1065–1075. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00485-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kjervik DK. A values orientation to health care policy. J Prof Nurs. 1996;12(2):67. doi: 10.1016/S8755-7223(96)80049-4. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources