Quantitative Clinical Imaging Methods for Monitoring Intratumoral Evolution
- PMID: 27807831
- DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6539-7_6
Quantitative Clinical Imaging Methods for Monitoring Intratumoral Evolution
Abstract
Solid tumors are multiscale, open, complex, dynamic systems: complex because they have many interacting components, dynamic because both the components and their interactions can change with time, and open because the tumor freely communicates with surrounding and even distant host tissue. Thus, it is not surprising that striking intratumoral variations are commonly observed in clinical imaging such as MRI and CT and that several recent studies found striking regional variations in the molecular properties of cancer cells from the same tumor. Interestingly, this spatial heterogeneity in molecular properties of tumor cells is typically ascribed to branching clonal evolution due to accumulating mutations while macroscopic variations observed in, for example, clinical MRI scans are usually viewed as functions of blood flow. The clinical significance of spatial heterogeneity has not been fully determined but there is a general consensus that the varying intratumoral landscape along with patient factors such as age, morbidity and lifestyle, contributes significantly to the often unpredictable response of individual patients within a disease cohort treated with the same standard-of-care therapy.Here we investigate the potential link between macroscopic tumor heterogeneity observed by clinical imaging and spatial variations in the observed molecular properties of cancer cells. We build on techniques developed in landscape ecology to link regional variations in the distribution of species with local environmental conditions that define their habitat. That is, we view each region of the tumor as a local ecosystem consisting of environmental conditions such as access to nutrients, oxygen, and means of waste clearance related to blood flow and the local population of tumor cells that both adapt to these conditions and, to some extent, change them through, for example, production of angiogenic factors. Furthermore, interactions among neighboring habitats can produce broader regional dynamics so that the internal diversity of tumors is the net result of complex multiscale somatic Darwinian interactions.Methods in landscape ecology harness Darwinian dynamics to link the environmental properties of a given region to the local populations which are assumed to represent maximally fit phenotypes within those conditions. Consider a common task of a landscape ecologist: defining the spatial distribution of species in a large region, e.g., in a satellite image. Clearly the most accurate approach requires a meter by meter survey of the multiple square kilometers in the region of interest. However, this is both impractical and potentially destructive. Instead, landscape ecology breaks the task into component parts relying on the Darwinian interdependence of environmental properties and fitness of specific species' phenotypic and genotypic properties. First, the satellite map is carefully analyzed to define the number and distribution of habitats. Then the species distribution in a representative sampling of each habitat is empirically determined. Ultimately, this permits sufficient bridging of spatial scales to accurately predict spatial distribution of plant and animal species within large regions.Currently, identifying intratumoral subpopulations requires detailed histological and molecular studies that are expensive and time consuming. Furthermore, this method is subject to sampling bias, is invasive for vital organs such as the brain, and inherently destructive precluding repeated assessments for monitoring post-treatment response and proteogenomic evolution. In contrast, modern cross-sectional imaging can interrogate the entire tumor noninvasively, allowing repeated analysis without disrupting the region of interest. In particular, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides exceptional spatial resolution and generates signals that are unique to the molecular constituents of tissue. Here we propose that MRI scans may be the equivalent of satellite images in landscape ecology and, with appropriate application of Darwinian first principles and sophisticated image analytic methods, can be used to estimate regional variations in the molecular properties of cancer cells.We have initially examined this technique in glioblastoma, a malignant brain neoplasm which is morphologically complex and notorious for a fast progression from diagnosis to recurrence and death, making a suitable subject of noninvasive, rapidly repeated assessment of intratumoral evolution. Quantitative imaging analysis of routine clinical MRIs from glioblastoma has identified macroscopic morphologic characteristics which correlate with proteogenomics and prognosis. The key to the accurate detection and forecasting of intratumoral evolution using quantitative imaging analysis is likely to be in the understanding of the synergistic interactions between observable intratumoral subregions and the resulting tumor behavior.
Keywords: Darwinian dynamics; Diagnostic imaging methods; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Genetic predisposition to disease; Individualized medicine; Intratumoral heterogeneity; Oncology; Proteogenomics; Treatment resistance and disease recurrence.
Similar articles
-
Quantitative imaging in cancer evolution and ecology.Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):8-15. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122697. Radiology. 2013. PMID: 24062559 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Identifying spatial imaging biomarkers of glioblastoma multiforme for survival group prediction.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jul;46(1):115-123. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25497. Epub 2016 Sep 28. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017. PMID: 27678245
-
Pathology to enhance precision medicine in oncology: lessons from landscape ecology.Adv Anat Pathol. 2015 Jul;22(4):267-72. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000078. Adv Anat Pathol. 2015. PMID: 26050264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Darwinian Dynamics of Intratumoral Heterogeneity: Not Solely Random Mutations but Also Variable Environmental Selection Forces.Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 1;76(11):3136-44. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2962. Epub 2016 Mar 23. Cancer Res. 2016. PMID: 27009166 Free PMC article.
-
Mutations, evolution and the central role of a self-defined fitness function in the initiation and progression of cancer.Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2017 Apr;1867(2):162-166. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 21. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28341421 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Pretreatment MRI Radiomics Based Response Prediction Model in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 31;11(4):631. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040631. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33807494 Free PMC article.
-
A rare case report and literatures review on primary germinoma in cerebellar hemisphere.Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Nov;33(11):2039-2045. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3502-2. Epub 2017 Jul 8. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017. PMID: 28689343 Review.
-
Integrating Quantitative Assays with Biologically Based Mathematical Modeling for Predictive Oncology.iScience. 2020 Nov 13;23(12):101807. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101807. eCollection 2020 Dec 18. iScience. 2020. PMID: 33299976 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma ecology theory: cancer as multidimensional spatiotemporal "unity of ecology and evolution" pathological ecosystem.Theranostics. 2023 Mar 5;13(5):1607-1631. doi: 10.7150/thno.82690. eCollection 2023. Theranostics. 2023. PMID: 37056571 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clonal evolution in leukemia.Nat Med. 2017 Oct 6;23(10):1135-1145. doi: 10.1038/nm.4410. Online ahead of print. Nat Med. 2017. PMID: 28985206 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical