Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2016 Nov 3;5(1):185.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0361-y.

Time to consider sharing data extracted from trials included in systematic reviews

Luke Wolfenden  1   2 , Jeremy Grimshaw  3 , Christopher M Williams  4   5 , Sze Lin Yoong  5
Affiliations
Editorial

Time to consider sharing data extracted from trials included in systematic reviews

Luke Wolfenden et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: While the debate regarding shared clinical trial data has shifted from whether such data should be shared to how this is best achieved, the sharing of data collected as part of systematic reviews has received little attention. In this commentary, we discuss the potential benefits of coordinated efforts to share data collected as part of systematic reviews.

Main body: There are a number of potential benefits of systematic review data sharing. Shared information and data obtained as part of the systematic review process may reduce unnecessary duplication, reduce demand on trialist to service repeated requests from reviewers for data, and improve the quality and efficiency of future reviews. Sharing also facilitates research to improve clinical trial and systematic review methods and supports additional analyses to address secondary research questions. While concerns regarding appropriate use of data, costs, or the academic return for original review authors may impede more open access to information extracted as part of systematic reviews, many of these issues are being addressed, and infrastructure to enable greater access to such information is being developed.

Conclusion: Embracing systems to enable more open access to systematic review data has considerable potential to maximise the benefits of research investment in undertaking systematic reviews.

Keywords: Data sharing; Open data; Review; Systematic reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ross SJ, Krumholz HM. Ushering in a new era of open science through data sharing. JAMA. 2013;309(13):1355–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.1299. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine Committee on Strategies for Responsible Sharing of Clinical Trial Data . Sharing clinical trial data: maximizing benefits, minimizing risks. Washington: National Academy of Sciences; 2015. - PubMed
    1. Mello MM, Francer JK, Wilenzick M, Teden P, Bierer BE, Barnes M. Preparing for responsible sharing of clinical trial data. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(17):1651–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhle1309073. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gøtzsche PC. We need access to all data from all clinical trials [editorial]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(10). doi:10.1002/14651858.ED000035. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolfe N, Gøtzsche PC, Bero L. Strategies for obtaining unpublished drug trial data: a qualitative interview study. Syst Rev. 2013;2:31. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-31. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources