Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;15(2):86-89.
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000312.

Physician Perspectives on Interhospital Transfers

Physician Perspectives on Interhospital Transfers

Stephanie K Mueller et al. J Patient Saf. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The transfer of patients between acute care hospitals (interhospital transfer [IHT]) is a common but nonstandardized process leading to variable quality and safety. The goal of this study was to survey accepting physicians regarding problems encountered in the transfer process.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of residents and inpatient attendings from internal medicine, neurology, and surgery services at a large tertiary care referral hospital was undertaken to identify problematic aspects of the IHT process as perceived by accepting frontline providers. The frequency that specific scenarios were encountered in caring for transferred patients and whether these processes impacted patient safety were determined using 5- and 3-point Likert scales, respectively. The frequency of responses to each question were measured using proportions.

Results: Approximately 51% of the 284 physicians surveyed responded. Pertinent findings included the following: physician subject surveys found that transferred patients sometimes, frequently, or always arrived without requiring specialized care in 56% of responses, arrived with unrealistic expectations of care in 77.2% of responses, arrived more than 24 hours after accepted for transfer in 80.1% of responses, and arrived without necessary transfer records in 86.9% of responses. Most respondents felt that lack of availability of transfer records and the time of day of arrival frequently posed a risk to transferred patients (57.2% and 53.1%, respectively). Response variation was noted between resident and attending physician respondents.

Conclusions: Expectations of care, delays and timing of transfer, and information exchange at time of transfer were identified as all too common problems in IHT, which creates a risk for patient safety. These areas are important targets for investigation and the development of interventions to improve patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author discloses no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
How frequently did you encounter the following?
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
How frequently do you think the following contributed to the safety of the transfer process?

References

    1. Iwashyna TJ, Christie JD, Moody J, et al. The structure of critical care transfer networks. Med Care. 2009;47:787–793. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iwashyna TJ, Kahn JM, Hayward RA, et al. Interhospital transfers among Medicare beneficiaries admitted for acute myocardial infarction at nonrevascularization hospitals. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3:468–475. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sokol-Hessner L, White AA, Davis KF, et al. Interhospital transfer patients discharged by academic hospitalists and general internists: characteristics and outcomes. J Hosp Med. 2016;11:245–250. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosk EA, Veinot T, Iwashyna TJ. Which patients and where: a qualitative study of patient transfers from community hospitals. Med Care. 2011;49:592–598. - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. House of Representatives. Office of the Law Revision Counsel. Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor. Title 42 USC § 1395dd. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2010-title42/USCODE-2010-title4.... Accessed March 14, 2016.