Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 3;11(11):e0165797.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165797. eCollection 2016.

The Impacts of Dietary Change on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use, Water Use, and Health: A Systematic Review

Lukasz Aleksandrowicz  1   2 , Rosemary Green  1   2 , Edward J M Joy  1   2 , Pete Smith  3 , Andy Haines  1   4
Affiliations

The Impacts of Dietary Change on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use, Water Use, and Health: A Systematic Review

Lukasz Aleksandrowicz et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Food production is a major driver of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water and land use, and dietary risk factors are contributors to non-communicable diseases. Shifts in dietary patterns can therefore potentially provide benefits for both the environment and health. However, there is uncertainty about the magnitude of these impacts, and the dietary changes necessary to achieve them. We systematically review the evidence on changes in GHG emissions, land use, and water use, from shifting current dietary intakes to environmentally sustainable dietary patterns. We find 14 common sustainable dietary patterns across reviewed studies, with reductions as high as 70-80% of GHG emissions and land use, and 50% of water use (with medians of about 20-30% for these indicators across all studies) possible by adopting sustainable dietary patterns. Reductions in environmental footprints were generally proportional to the magnitude of animal-based food restriction. Dietary shifts also yielded modest benefits in all-cause mortality risk. Our review reveals that environmental and health benefits are possible by shifting current Western diets to a variety of more sustainable dietary patterns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Selection of eligible studies.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Relative differences in GHG emissions (kg CO2eq/capita/year) between current average diets and sustainable dietary patterns.
Note: n = number of studies, mdn = median.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Relative differences in land use (m2/capita/year) between current average diets and sustainable dietary patterns.
Note: n = number of studies, mdn = median.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Relative differences in water use (L/capita/day) between current average diets and sustainable dietary patterns.
Note: n = number of studies, mdn = median. The lower and upper bounds of the boxes represent the 1st and 3rd quartiles, respectively, and the line within is the median. Whiskers show the minimum and maximum range, excluding outliers, which are shown as dots, and represent values more than 1.5 times the 1st and 3rd quartiles.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2015. http://newsroom.unfccc.int/unfccc-newsroom/finale-cop21/ (Accessed 16 February 2015).
    1. Whitmee S, Haines A, Beyrer C, Boltz F, Capon AG, de Souza Dias BF, et al. Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary health. Lancet. 2015;386:1973–2028. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, Clark H, Dong H, Elsiddig EA, et al. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, et al., editors. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York City, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 811–922.
    1. Herrero M, Havlík P, Valin H, Notenbaert A, Rufino M, Thornton P, et al. Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. PNAS. 2013;110:20888–93. 10.1073/pnas.1308149110 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Butler CD. Climate change and global health: a new conceptual framework—mini review. CAB Rev. 2014;9:No. 027.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources