Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 3;26(4):395-402.
doi: 10.3233/VES-160591.

Compensatory saccades in head impulse testing influence the dynamic visual acuity of patients with unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy1

Affiliations

Compensatory saccades in head impulse testing influence the dynamic visual acuity of patients with unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy1

V G Wettstein et al. J Vestib Res. .

Abstract

Background: Both the dynamic visual acuity (DVA) test and the video head-impulse test (vHIT) are fast and simple ways to assess peripheral vestibulopathy. After losing peripheral vestibular function, some patients show better DVA performance than others, suggesting good compensatory mechanisms. It seems possible that compensatory covert saccades could be responsible for improved DVA.

Objective: To investigate VOR gain and compensatory saccades with vHIT and compare them to the DVA of patients with unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy.

Methods: VOR gain deficit and compensatory saccades were measured with vHIT. VOR gain was calculated for each trial as mean eye velocity divided by mean head velocity during 4 samples between 24 ms - 40 ms after peak head acceleration. DVA was then assessed. VHIT was analyzed for percentage of covert saccades and for cumulative overt saccade amplitude. Twenty-four patients with unilateral vestibular deficit were included. A control group of 113 healthy subjects provided normal data.

Results: On the affected side, pathologic values for DVA (mean 0.83 logMAR±0.25 SD) and VOR gain (mean 0.16±0.13) were obtained, whereas the healthy side showed normal values (0.53 logMAR±0.15 for DVA and 0.89±0.18 for VOR gain). Yet, DVA performance on the affected side was significantly better in patients with higher covert saccade percentage (p = 0.012) and lower cumulative overt saccade amplitude (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Compensatory covert saccades seen in vHIT correlate with improved performance of DVA-testing in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular loss. Hence, in addition to testing peripheral vestibulopathy, our results indicate a way for assessing rehabilitatory compensation in such patients by DVA in addition to vHIT.

Keywords: Vestibulopathy; compensatory saccades; dynamic visual acuity; head impulse test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources