Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 4;4(4):e123.
doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6469.

A Brief Tool to Assess Image-Based Dietary Records and Guide Nutrition Counselling Among Pregnant Women: An Evaluation

Affiliations

A Brief Tool to Assess Image-Based Dietary Records and Guide Nutrition Counselling Among Pregnant Women: An Evaluation

Amy M Ashman et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: Dietitians ideally should provide personally tailored nutrition advice to pregnant women. Provision is hampered by a lack of appropriate tools for nutrition assessment and counselling in practice settings. Smartphone technology, through the use of image-based dietary records, can address limitations of traditional methods of recording dietary intake. Feedback on these records can then be provided by the dietitian via smartphone. Efficacy and validity of these methods requires examination.

Objective: The aims of the Australian Diet Bytes and Baby Bumps study, which used image-based dietary records and a purpose-built brief Selected Nutrient and Diet Quality (SNaQ) tool to provide tailored nutrition advice to pregnant women, were to assess relative validity of the SNaQ tool for analyzing dietary intake compared with nutrient analysis software, to describe the nutritional intake adequacy of pregnant participants, and to assess acceptability of dietary feedback via smartphone.

Methods: Eligible women used a smartphone app to record everything they consumed over 3 nonconsecutive days. Records consisted of an image of the food or drink item placed next to a fiducial marker, with a voice or text description, or both, providing additional detail. We used the SNaQ tool to analyze participants' intake of daily food group servings and selected key micronutrients for pregnancy relative to Australian guideline recommendations. A visual reference guide consisting of images of foods and drinks in standard serving sizes assisted the dietitian with quantification. Feedback on participants' diets was provided via 2 methods: (1) a short video summary sent to participants' smartphones, and (2) a follow-up telephone consultation with a dietitian. Agreement between dietary intake assessment using the SNaQ tool and nutrient analysis software was evaluated using Spearman rank correlation and Cohen kappa.

Results: We enrolled 27 women (median age 28.8 years, 8 Indigenous Australians, 15 primiparas), of whom 25 completed the image-based dietary record. Median intakes of grains, vegetables, fruit, meat, and dairy were below recommendations. Median (interquartile range) intake of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods was 3.5 (2.4-3.9) servings/day and exceeded recommendations (0-2.5 servings/day). Positive correlations between the SNaQ tool and nutrient analysis software were observed for energy (ρ=.898, P<.001) and all selected micronutrients (iron, calcium, zinc, folate, and iodine, ρ range .510-.955, all P<.05), both with and without vitamin and mineral supplements included in the analysis. Cohen kappa showed moderate to substantial agreement for selected micronutrients when supplements were included (kappa range .488-.803, all P ≤.001) and for calcium, iodine, and zinc when excluded (kappa range .554-.632, all P<.001). A total of 17 women reported changing their diet as a result of the personalized nutrition advice.

Conclusions: The SNaQ tool demonstrated acceptable validity for assessing adequacy of key pregnancy nutrient intakes and preliminary evidence of utility to support dietitians in providing women with personalized advice to optimize nutrition during pregnancy.

Keywords: image-based dietary records; nutrition assessment; pregnancy; telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diet Bytes and Baby Bumps study protocol.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of an image-based dietary record in the Diet Bytes and Baby Bumps study, consisting of image, fiducial marker, and audio description of the food and drink items.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The Selected Nutrient and Diet Quality (SNaQ) analysis tool and portion size estimation aid (PSEA) for analysis of image-based dietary records in the Diet Bytes and Baby Bumps study. AGTHE: Australian Guide to Healthy Eating.

References

    1. Dietitians Association of Australia What is an accredited practising dietitian. [2016-08-09]. http://daa.asn.au/for-the-public/find-an-apd/what-is-an-accredited-pract...
    1. McCabe-Sellers B. Advancing the art and science of dietary assessment through technology. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Jan;110(1):52–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.014.S0002-8223(09)01690-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thompson FE, Subar AF, Loria CM, Reedy JL, Baranowski T. Need for technological innovation in dietary assessment. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Jan;110(1):48–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.008. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/20102826 S0002-8223(09)01684-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mela DJ, Aaron JI. Honest but invalid: what subjects say about recording their food intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997 Jul;97(7):791–3. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00195-8.S0002-8223(97)00195-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rebro SM, Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Cheney CL. The effect of keeping food records on eating patterns. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Oct;98(10):1163–5. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00269-7.S0002-8223(98)00269-7 - DOI - PubMed