Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 30;83(2):e02694-16.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02694-16. Print 2017 Jan 15.

Impacts of Seasonal Housing and Teat Preparation on Raw Milk Microbiota: a High-Throughput Sequencing Study

Affiliations

Impacts of Seasonal Housing and Teat Preparation on Raw Milk Microbiota: a High-Throughput Sequencing Study

Conor J Doyle et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. .

Abstract

In pasture-based systems, changes in dairy herd habitat due to seasonality results in the exposure of animals to different environmental niches. These niches contain distinct microbial communities that may be transferred to raw milk, with potentially important food quality and safety implications for milk producers. It is postulated that the extent to which these microorganisms are transferred could be limited by the inclusion of a teat preparation step prior to milking. High-throughput sequencing on a variety of microbial niches on farms was used to study the patterns of microbial movement through the dairy production chain and, in the process, to investigate the impact of seasonal housing and the inclusion/exclusion of a teat preparation regime on the raw milk microbiota from the same herd over two sampling periods, i.e., indoor and outdoor. Beta diversity and network analyses showed that environmental and milk microbiotas separated depending on whether they were sourced from an indoor or outdoor environment. Within these respective habitats, similarities between the milk microbiota and that of teat swab samples and, to a lesser extent, fecal samples were apparent. Indeed, SourceTracker identified the teat surface as the most significant source of contamination, with herd feces being the next most prevalent source of contamination. In milk from cows grazing outdoors, teat prep significantly increased the numbers of total bacteria present. In summary, sequence-based microbiota analysis identified possible sources of raw milk contamination and highlighted the influence of environment and farm management practices on the raw milk microbiota.

Importance: The composition of the raw milk microbiota is an important consideration from both a spoilage perspective and a food safety perspective and has implications for milk targeted for direct consumption and for downstream processing. Factors that influence contamination have been examined previously, primarily through the use of culture-based techniques. We describe here the extensive application of high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies to study the relationship between the milk production environment and the raw milk microbiota. The results show that the environment in which the herd was kept was the primary driver of the composition of the milk microbiota composition.

Keywords: farm practices; food chain; food safety; metagenomics; microbial source tracking; raw milk microbiota.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
(A) Bray-Curtis PCoA plot of milk and environmental samples. (B) Bray-Curtis Network plot of milk and environmental samples. SourceSink indicates whether a sample is classified as a potential source of contamination or a sink for contaminating communities. ENV_dif indicated the sample origin.
FIG 2
FIG 2
SourceTracker results highlight the percentages of inferred sources of contamination in BTM and individual milk samples.

References

    1. Sevi A, Albenzio M, Muscio A, Casamassima D, Centoducati P. 2003. Effects of litter management on airborne particulates in sheep houses and on the yield and quality of ewe milk. Livestock Production Sci 81:1–12. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00228-2. - DOI
    1. Vacheyrou M, Normand A-C, Guyot P, Cassagne C, Piarroux R, Bouton Y. 2011. Cultivable microbial communities in raw cow milk and potential transfers from stables of sixteen French farms. Int J Food Microbiol 146:253–262. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.02.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vithanage NR, Dissanayake M, Bolge G, Palombo EA, Yeager TR, Datta N. 2016. Biodiversity of culturable psychrotrophic microbiota in raw milk attributable to refrigeration conditions, seasonality and their spoilage potential. Int Dairy J 57:80–90. doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2016.02.042. - DOI
    1. Mhone TA, Matope G, Saidi PT. 2011. Aerobic bacterial, coliform, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus counts of raw and processed milk from selected smallholder dairy farms of Zimbabwe. Int J Food Microbiol 151:223–228. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.08.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doyle CJ, Gleeson D, Jordan K, Beresford TP, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Cotter PD. 2015. Anaerobic sporeformers and their significance with respect to milk and dairy products. Int J Food Microbiol 197:77–87. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.12.022. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources