Self-Reported Losses Versus Actual Losses in Online Gambling: An Empirical Study
- PMID: 27815667
- PMCID: PMC5579145
- DOI: 10.1007/s10899-016-9648-0
Self-Reported Losses Versus Actual Losses in Online Gambling: An Empirical Study
Abstract
Many research findings in the gambling studies field rely on self-report data. A very small body of empirical research also suggests that when using self-report, players report their gambling losses inaccurately. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the differences between objective and subjective gambling spent data by comparing gambler's actual behavioral tracking data with their self-report data over a 1-month period. A total of 17,742 Norwegian online gamblers were asked to participate in an online survey. Of those surveyed, 1335 gamblers answered questions relating to gambling expenditure that could be compared with their actual gambling behavior. The study found that the estimated loss self-reported by gamblers was correlated with the actual objective loss and that players with higher losses tended to have more difficulty estimating their gambling expenditure (i.e., players who spent more money gambling also appeared to have more trouble estimating their expenses accurately). Overall, the findings demonstrate that caution is warranted when using self-report data relating to amount of money spent gambling in any studies that are totally reliant on self-report data.
Keywords: Behavioral tracking; Gambling expenditure; Pre-commitment; Responsible gambling.
Conflict of interest statement
Michael Auer received funding support from Norsk Tipping for this work. Mark D. Griffiths was sub-contracted by neccton Ltd. The second author has received funding for a number of research projects in the area of gambling education for young people, social responsibility in gambling and gambling treatment from the
Figures
Comment in
-
When Criticizing Others It is Helpful to Focus on Actual Behavior: A Comment About Auer and Griffiths (2016).J Gambl Stud. 2017 Dec;33(4):1035-1037. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9667-x. J Gambl Stud. 2017. PMID: 28035637 Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- Afifi TO, LaPlante DA, Taillieu TL, Dowd D, Shaffer HJ. Gambling involvement: Considering frequency of play and the moderating effects of gender and age. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2014;12:283–294. doi: 10.1007/s11469-013-9452-3. - DOI
-
- Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician. 1983;32:307–317. doi: 10.2307/2987937. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
