Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;33(3):795-806.
doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9648-0.

Self-Reported Losses Versus Actual Losses in Online Gambling: An Empirical Study

Affiliations

Self-Reported Losses Versus Actual Losses in Online Gambling: An Empirical Study

Michael Auer et al. J Gambl Stud. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Many research findings in the gambling studies field rely on self-report data. A very small body of empirical research also suggests that when using self-report, players report their gambling losses inaccurately. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the differences between objective and subjective gambling spent data by comparing gambler's actual behavioral tracking data with their self-report data over a 1-month period. A total of 17,742 Norwegian online gamblers were asked to participate in an online survey. Of those surveyed, 1335 gamblers answered questions relating to gambling expenditure that could be compared with their actual gambling behavior. The study found that the estimated loss self-reported by gamblers was correlated with the actual objective loss and that players with higher losses tended to have more difficulty estimating their gambling expenditure (i.e., players who spent more money gambling also appeared to have more trouble estimating their expenses accurately). Overall, the findings demonstrate that caution is warranted when using self-report data relating to amount of money spent gambling in any studies that are totally reliant on self-report data.

Keywords: Behavioral tracking; Gambling expenditure; Pre-commitment; Responsible gambling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Michael Auer received funding support from Norsk Tipping for this work. Mark D. Griffiths was sub-contracted by neccton Ltd. The second author has received funding for a number of research projects in the area of gambling education for young people, social responsibility in gambling and gambling treatment from the Responsibility in Gambling Trust, a charitable body which funds its research program based on donations from the gambling industry. Both authors undertake consultancy for various gaming companies in the area of social responsibility in gambling.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bland Altman plot of the subjective data and objective data of players (n = 1335)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bland Altman plot of the subjective data and objective data of players (n = 1335) with a limited range of the x-axis metric and the y-axis metric

Comment in

References

    1. Afifi TO, LaPlante DA, Taillieu TL, Dowd D, Shaffer HJ. Gambling involvement: Considering frequency of play and the moderating effects of gender and age. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2014;12:283–294. doi: 10.1007/s11469-013-9452-3. - DOI
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician. 1983;32:307–317. doi: 10.2307/2987937. - DOI
    1. Auer M, Griffiths MD. Voluntary limit setting and player choice in most intense online gamblers: An empirical study of gambling behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2013;29:647–660. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9332-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auer M, Griffiths MD. An empirical investigation of theoretical loss and gambling intensity. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2014;30:879–887. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9376-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auer M, Griffiths MD. Testing normative and self-appraisal feedback in an online slot-machine pop-up message in a real-world setting. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6:339. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources