Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:7087053.
doi: 10.1155/2016/7087053. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

Random Survival Forests for Predicting the Bed Occupancy in the Intensive Care Unit

Affiliations

Random Survival Forests for Predicting the Bed Occupancy in the Intensive Care Unit

Joeri Ruyssinck et al. Comput Math Methods Med. 2016.

Abstract

Predicting the bed occupancy of an intensive care unit (ICU) is a daunting task. The uncertainty associated with the prognosis of critically ill patients and the random arrival of new patients can lead to capacity problems and the need for reactive measures. In this paper, we work towards a predictive model based on Random Survival Forests which can assist physicians in estimating the bed occupancy. As input data, we make use of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score collected and calculated from 4098 patients at two ICU units of Ghent University Hospital over a time period of four years. We compare the performance of our system with a baseline performance and a standard Random Forest regression approach. Our results indicate that Random Survival Forests can effectively be used to assist in the occupancy prediction problem. Furthermore, we show that a group based approach, such as Random Survival Forests, performs better compared to a setting in which the length of stay of a patient is individually assessed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of the computation of loadpred, given a set of patient data.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplot for error measure E for the three methods considered: baseline (B), Random Forests (R), and Random Survival Forests (S).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The relative variable importance measure for the Random Forest and Random Survival Forest.

References

    1. Quinn T. D., Gabriel R. A., Dutton R. P., Urman R. D. Analysis of unplanned postoperative admissions to the intensive care unit. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2015 doi: 10.1177/0885066615622124. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Halpern N. A., Pastores S. M. Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs. Critical Care Medicine. 2010;38(1):65–71. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b090d0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincent J.-L., Moreno R., Takala J., et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Medicine. 1996;22(7):707–710. doi: 10.1007/s001340050156. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knaus W. A., Draper E. A., Wagner D. P., Zimmerman J. E. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Critical Care Medicine. 1985;13(10):818–829. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Le Gall J.-R., Lemeshow S., Saulnier F. A new simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1993;270(24):2957–2963. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510240069035. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms