Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):CD011426.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011426.pub2.

Topical antibiotics for preventing surgical site infection in wounds healing by primary intention

Clare F Heal  1 , Jennifer L Banks, Phoebe D Lepper, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Mieke L van Driel
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Topical antibiotics for preventing surgical site infection in wounds healing by primary intention

Clare F Heal et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) can delay wound healing, impair cosmetic outcome and increase healthcare costs. Topical antibiotics are sometimes used to reduce microbial contaminant exposure following surgical procedures, with the aim of reducing SSIs.

Objectives: The primary objective of this review was to determine whether the application of topical antibiotics to surgical wounds that are healing by primary intention reduces the incidence of SSI and whether it increases the incidence of adverse outcomes (allergic contact dermatitis, infections with patterns of antibiotic resistance and anaphylaxis).

Search methods: In May 2015 we searched: the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; the Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL. We also searched clinical trial registries for ongoing studies, and bibliographies of relevant publications to identify further eligible trials. There was no restriction of language, date of study or setting. The search was repeated in May 2016 to ensure currency of included studies.

Selection criteria: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials that assessed the effects of topical antibiotics (any formulation, including impregnated dressings) in people with surgical wounds healing by primary intention were eligible for inclusion.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently selected studies and independently extracted data. Two authors then assessed the studies for risk of bias. Risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous variables, and when a sufficient number of comparable trials were available, trials were pooled in a meta-analysis.

Main results: A total of 10 RCTs and four quasi-randomised trials with 6466 participants met the inclusion criteria. Six studies involved minor procedures conducted in an outpatient or emergency department setting; eight studies involved major surgery conducted in theatre. Nine different topical antibiotics were included. We included two three-arm trials, two four-arm trials and 10 two-arm trials. The control groups comprised; an alternative topical antibiotic (two studies), topical antiseptic (six studies) and no topical antibiotic (10 studies), which comprised inert ointment (five studies) no treatment (four studies) and one study with one arm of each.The risk of bias of the 14 studies varied. Seven studies were at high risk of bias, five at unclear risk of bias and two at low risk of bias. Most risk of bias concerned risk of selection bias.Twelve of the studies (6259 participants) reported infection rates, although we could not extract the data for this outcome from one study. Four studies (3334 participants) measured allergic contact dermatitis as an outcome. Four studies measured positive wound swabs for patterns of antimicrobial resistance, for which there were no outcomes reported. No episodes of anaphylaxis were reported. Topical antibiotic versus no topical antibioticWe pooled the results of eight trials (5427 participants) for the outcome of SSI. Topical antibiotics probably reduce the risk of SSI in people with surgical wounds healing by primary intention compared with no topical antibiotic (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.87; moderate-quality evidence downgraded once for risk of bias). This equates to 20 fewer SSIs per 1000 patients treated with topical antibiotics (95% CI 7 to 29) and a number needed to treat for one additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) (i.e. prevention of one SSI) of 50.We pooled the results of three trials (3012 participants) for the outcome of allergic contact dermatitis, however this comparison was underpowered, and it is unclear whether topical antibiotics affect the risk of allergic contact dermatitis (RR 3.94, 95% CI 0.46 to 34.00; very low-quality evidence, downgraded twice for risk of bias, once for imprecision). Topical antibiotic versus antiseptic We pooled the results of five trials (1299 participants) for the outcome of SSI. Topical antibiotics probably reduce the risk of SSI in people with surgical wounds healing by primary intention compared with using topical antiseptics (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.80; moderate-quality evidence downgraded once for risk of bias). This equates to 43 fewer SSIs per 1000 patients treated with topical antibiotics instead of antiseptics (95% CI 17 to 59) and an NNTB of 24.We pooled the results of two trials (541 participants) for the outcome of allergic contact dermatitis; there was no clear difference in the risk of dermatitis between topical antibiotics and antiseptics, however this comparison was underpowered and a difference cannot be ruled out (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.82; very low-quality evidence, downgraded twice for risk of bias and once for imprecision). Topical antibiotic versus topical antibioticOne study (99 participants) compared mupirocin ointment with a combination ointment of neomycin/polymyxin B/bacitracin zinc for the outcome of SSI. There was no clear difference in the risk of SSI, however this comparison was underpowered (very low-quality evidence downgraded twice for risk of bias, once for imprecision).A four-arm trial involved two antibiotic arms (neomycin sulfate/bacitracin zinc/polymyxin B sulphate combination ointment versus bacitracin zinc, 219 participants). There was no clear difference in risk of SSI between the combination ointment and the bacitracin zinc ointment. The quality of evidence for this outcome was low, downgraded once for risk of bias, and once for imprecision.

Authors' conclusions: Topical antibiotics applied to surgical wounds healing by primary intention probably reduce the risk of SSI relative to no antibiotic, and relative to topical antiseptics (moderate quality evidence). We are unable to draw conclusions regarding the effects of topical antibiotics on adverse outcomes such as allergic contact dermatitis due to lack of statistical power (small sample sizes). We are also unable to draw conclusions regarding the impact of increasing topical antibiotic use on antibiotic resistance. The relative effects of different topical antibiotics are unclear.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Clare Heal – none known. Mieke van Driel – none known. Phoebe Lepper – none known. Evan Kotopantelis ‐ none known. Jennifer Banks – none known.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram
2
2
3
3
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Topical antibiotic versus no topical antibiotic, Outcome 1 Surgical site infection.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Topical antibiotic versus no topical antibiotic, Outcome 2 Allergic contact dermatitis.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Topical antibiotic versus no topical antibiotic, Outcome 3 Wounds healed in 5‐14 days.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Topical antibiotic versus antiseptic, Outcome 1 Surgical site infection.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Topical antibiotic versus antiseptic, Outcome 2 Allergic contact dermatitis.
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Topical antibiotic versus antiseptic, Outcome 3 Wounds healed in 5‐14 days.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Caro 1967 {published data only}
    1. Caro D, Reynolds KW, DeSmith J. An investigation to evaluate a topical antibiotic in the prevention of wound sepsis in a casualty department. The British Journal of Clinical Practice 1967;21(12):605‐7. - PubMed
Dire 1995 {published data only}
    1. Dire DJ, Coppola M, Dwyer DA, Lorette JJ, Karr JL. Prospective evaluation of topical antibiotics for preventing Infections in uncomplicated soft‐tissue wounds repaired in the ED. Academic Emergency Medicine 1995;2(1):4‐10. - PubMed
Dixon 2006 {published data only}
    1. Dixon AJ, Dixon MP, Dixon JB. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of applying ointment to surgical wounds before occlusive dressing. British Journal of Surgery 2006;93(8):937‐43. - PubMed
Gilmore 1973a {published data only}
    1. Gilmore OJA, Martin TDM, Fletcher BN. Prevention of wound infection after appendicectomy. The Lancet 1973;1(7797):220‐2. - PubMed
Gough 1990a {published data only}
    1. Gough DCS, Lawton N. Circumcision – which dressing?. British Journal of Urology 1990;65(4):418‐9. - PubMed
Gough 1990b {published data only}
    1. Gough DCS, Lawton N. Circumcision – which dressing?. British Journal of Urology 1990;65(4):481‐9. - PubMed
Heal 2009 {published data only}
    1. Heal CF, Buettner PG, Cruickshank R, Graham D, Browning S, Pendergast J, et al. Does single application of topical chloramphenicol to high risk sutured wounds reduce incidence of wound infection after minor surgery? Prospective randomised placebo controlled double blind trial. BMJ 2009;338. - PMC - PubMed
Hood 2004 {published data only}
    1. Hood R, Shermock KM, Emerman C. A prospective, randomized pilot evaluation of topical triple antibiotic versus mupirocin for the prevention of uncomplicated soft tissue wound infection. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2004;22(1):1‐3. - PubMed
Iselin 1990 {published data only}
    1. Iselin F, Audren JL, Gouet O, Hautefort E, Peze W, Pradet G. Comparative study of the effects of a local antibiotic and a local antiseptic in emergency hand surgery [Étude comparée des effets d'un antibiotique et d'un antiseptique locaux en chirurgie d'urgence de la main]. Annales de Chirurgie de la Main et du Membre Superieur: Organe Officiel des Societes de Chirurgie de la Main 1990;9(1):65‐71. - PubMed
Kamath 2005 {published data only}
    1. Kamath S, Sinha S, Shaari E, Young D, Campbell AC. Role of topical antibiotics in hip surgery. A prospective randomised study. International Journal of the Care of the Injured 2005;36(6):783‐7. - PubMed
Khalighi 2014 {published data only}
    1. Khalighi K, Aung TT, Elmi F. The role of prophylaxis topical antibiotics in cardiac device implantation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 2014;37(3):304‐11. - PubMed
Neri 2008 {published data only}
    1. Neri V, Fersini A, Ambrosi A, Tartaglia N, Valentino TP. Umbilical port‐site complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: role of topical antibiotic therapy. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2008;12(2):126‐32. - PMC - PubMed
Pradhan 2009 {published data only}
    1. Pradhan GBN, Agrawal J. Comparative study of post operative wound infection following lower segment caesarean section with and without the topical use of fusidic acid. Nepal Medical College Journal 2009;11(3):189‐91. - PubMed
Smack 1996 {published data only}
    1. Smack DP, Harrington AC, Dunn C, Howard RS, Szkutnik AJ, Krivda SJ, et al. Infection and allergy Incidence in ambulatory surgery patients using white petrolatum vs bacitracin ointment: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1996;276(12):972‐7. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Andersen 1970 {published data only}
    1. Andersen B, Ostergaard H. Ampicillin in the prophylaxis of wound infection in elective operation for cancer of the colon. A controlled study of the value of local application to the wound [Ampicillinprofylake mod sarinfektion ved elektiv operation for coloncancer]. Ugeskrift for Laeger 1970;132(24):1133‐5. - PubMed
Andersen 1972 {published data only}
    1. Andersen B, Bendtsen L, Schantz A. Wound infections after appendicectomy: I A controlled trial on the prophylactic efficacy of topical ampicillin in non‐perforated appendix. II A controlled trial on the prophylactic efficacy of delayed primary suture and topical ampicillin in perforated appendix. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica 1972;138(5):531‐6. - PubMed
Andrew 2012 {published data only}
    1. Andrew R, Luecke G, Dozier S, Diven D. A pilot study to investigate the efficacy of tobramycin‐dexamethasone ointment in promoting wound healing. Dermatology and Therapy 2012;2(12). - PMC - PubMed
Bates 1974 {published data only}
    1. Bates T, Down RHL, Houghton MCV, Lloyd GJ. Topical ampicillin in the prevention of wound infection after appendicectomy. British Journal of Surgery 1974;61:489‐92. - PubMed
Battista 2001 {published data only}
    1. Battista F, Zund S, Giordano H, Soto F, Cascarelli L. Use of antibiotics in topical form for prevention of surgical site infection [Utilizacion de antibioticos en forma topica en la prevencion de infeccion de sitio quirurgico]. Revista Argentina de Residentes de Cirugia 2001;6(2):44‐6.
Bayerl 2004 {published data only}
    1. Bayerl C, Volp A. [Tyrothicin‐puder bei hautverletzungen: Reduktion des wundradius bei infizierten und infektionsgefahrdeten wunden ‐ eine randomisierte, placebo kontrollierte doppelblind‐studie]. Pharmazie 2004;59(11):864‐8. - PubMed
Bencini 1991 {published data only}
    1. Bencini P, Galimberti M, Signorini M, Crosti C. Antibiotic prophylaxis of wound infections in skin surgery. Archives of Dermatology 1991;127:1357‐60. - PubMed
Bird 1971 {published data only}
    1. Bird G, Bunch G, Croft C, Hoffmann D, Humphrey C, Rhind J, et al. Topical noxythiolin antisepsis. British Journal of Surgery 1971;58(6):447‐8. - PubMed
Blobel 1970 {published data only}
    1. Blobel R, Polack J. Attempt to 'locally' prevent postoperative urinary tract infections following gynecologic surgery [Versuch einer 'lokalen' prophylaxe der postoperativen harnwegsinfektionen nach vaginalen gynakologischen operationen]. Die Medizinische Welt 1970;36:1572‐4. - PubMed
Bluhm 1986 {published data only}
    1. Bluhm G, Nordlander R, Ransjo U. Antibiotic prophylaxis in pacemaker surgery: a prospective double blind trial with systemic administration of antiobiotic versus placebo at implantation of cardiac pacemakers. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 1986;9(5):720‐6. - PubMed
Bos 2007 {published data only}
    1. Bos A, Tilburg M, Sorge A, Klinkenbijl. Randomized clinical trial of surgical technique and local antibiotics for ingrowing toenail. British Journal of Surgery 2007;94:292‐6. - PubMed
Campbell 2005 {published data only}
    1. Campbell R, Perlis C, Fisher E, Gloster H. Gentamicin ointment versus petrolatum for management of auricular wounds. Dermatologic Surgery 2005;31:664‐9. - PubMed
Charalambous 2003 {published data only}
    1. Charalambous C, Tryfonidis M, Swindell R, Lipsett AP. When should old therapies be abandoned? A modern look at old studies on topical ampicillin. Journal of Infection 2003;47:203‐9. - PubMed
Czarnecki 1992 {published data only}
    1. Czarnecki D, Meehan C, Nash C. Prevention of post‐excisional wound infections: a comparison of oral cephalexin with topical mupirocin and topical cetrimide‐chlorhexidine cream. International Journal of Dermatology 1992;31(5):359‐60. - PubMed
Draelos 2011 {published data only}
    1. Draelos Z, Trookman N, Rizer, R. Postprocedural wound healing efficacy and safety in a clinical setting: a comparison of topical antibiotic ointment versus skin protectant ointment. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2011;64(2 SUPP):S23‐9. - PubMed
Eason 2004 {published data only}
    1. Eason A, Wells G, Garber G, Hopkins M. Prophylactic antibiotics for abdominal hysterectomy: indication for low‐risk Canadian women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2004;26(12):1067‐71. - PubMed
Evans 1974 {published data only}
    1. Evans C, Pollock A, Rosenberg I. The reduction of surgical wound infections by topical cephaloridine: a controlled clinical trial. British Journal of Surgery 1974;61:133‐5. - PubMed
Fielding 1965 {published data only}
    1. Fielding G, Rao A, Davis N, Wernigk N. Prophylactic topical use of antibiotics in surgical wounds: a controlled clinical trial using 'Polybactrin'. The Medical Journal of Australia 1965;2(4):159‐61. - PubMed
Finch 1979 {published data only}
    1. Finch D, Taylor L, Morris P. Wound sepsis following gastrointestinal surgery: a comparison of topical and two‐dose systemic cephradine. British Journal of Surgery 1979;66(8):580‐2. - PubMed
Gilmore 1973b {published data only}
    1. Gilmore O, Welbourn R. Controlled trial of wound spraying with poly‐antibiotic or povidone iodine aerosols. British Journal of Surgery 1973;60(11):910‐1. - PubMed
Grandis 1994 {published data only}
    1. Grandis J, Vickers R, Rihs J, Yu V, Johnson J. Efficacy of topical amoxicillin plus clavulanate/ticarcillin plus clavulanate and clindamycin in contaminated head and neck surgery: effect of antibiotic spectra and duration of therapy. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 1994;170(3):729‐32. - PubMed
Hildred 1977 {published data only}
    1. Hildred S, Henderson C. Does antibiotic spray reduce wound infection?. British Medical Journal 1977;2:869. - PMC - PubMed
Jackson 1971 {published data only}
    1. Jackson D, Pollock A, Tindal D. The effect of an antibiotic spray in the prevention of wound infection. A controlled trial. British Journal of Surgery 1971;58(8):565‐6. - PubMed
Jensen 1975 {published data only}
    1. Jensen M, McKenzie R, Hugh T, Lake B. Topical ampicillin‐cloxacillin in the prevention of abdominal wound sepsis. The British Journal of Clinical Practice 1975;29(5):115‐8. - PubMed
Johnson 2005 {published data only}
    1. Johnson D, Eps C, Mudge D, Wiggins K, Armstrong K, Hawley C, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of topical exit‐site application of honey (Medihoney) versus mupirocin for the prevention of catheter‐associated infections in hemodialysis patients. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2005;16:1456‐62. - PubMed
Juul 1985 {published data only}
    1. Juul P, Merrild M, Kronborg M. Topical ampicillin in addition to a systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. A prospective randomized study. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 1985;28:804‐6. - PubMed
Kenning 1980 {published data only}
    1. Kenning BR, McIntosh I, Nagesh A, Rosenberg P. A comparative trial of cephaloridine with polybactrin, povidone‐iodine and control for prophylaxis of wound infection in abdominal surgery. British Journal of Clinical Practice 1980;34(2):45‐6,54. - PubMed
Kircik 2013 {published data only}
    1. Kircik L, Dickerson J, Kitten C, Weedon K, Slade H. Allogeneic growth arrested keratinocytes and fibroblasts delivered in a fibrin spray accelerate healing in Mohs micrographic surgery wounds. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology 2013;12(5):558‐61. - PubMed
Leyden 1985 {published data only}
    1. Leyden J. Effect of bactroban ointment: neosporin ointment and garamycin ointment in the prophylaxis of infection of cutaneous wounds in human volunteers. Bactroban (mupirocin): Proceedings of an international symposium; 1984 May 21‐22; Nassau, Bahama Islands. New York: Excerpta Medica, 1985:84‐90.
Livingston 1990 {published data only}
    1. Livingston D, Cryer H, Miller F, Malangoni M, Polk H, Weiner L. A randomized prospective study of topical antimicrobial agents on skin grafts after thermal injury. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1990;86(6):1059‐64. - PubMed
Mann 2001 {published data only}
    1. Mann T, Orlikowski C, Gurrin L, Keils A. The effect of the biopatch, a chlorhexidine impregnated dressing, on bacterial colonization of epidural catheter exit sites. Anasthaesia and Intensive Care 2001;29:600‐3. - PubMed
Mayer 1973 {published data only}
    1. Mayer HG. Prevention of urinary tract infections following gynecologic surgery [Zur verhutung von harnwegsinfektionen nach gynäkologischen operationen]. Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift 1973;123(12):188‐90. - PubMed
Merrild 1985 {published data only}
    1. Merrild U, Juul P, Kronburg O. Local ampicillin prevention of wound infection after elective colorectal surgery [Lokal ampicillinprofylakse mod sårinfektion efter elektiv kolorektal kirugi]. Ugeskrift for Laeger 1985;147(10):876‐8. - PubMed
Motta 2005 {published data only}
    1. Motta G, Trigilia D. The effect of an antimicrobial drain sponge dressing on specific bacterial isolates at tracheostomy sites. Ostomy/Wound Management 2005;51(1):60‐2, 64‐6. - PubMed
Mountain 1970 {published data only}
    1. Mountain J, Seal P. Topical ampicillin in grid‐iron appendicectomy wounds. The British Journal of Clinical Practice 1970;24(3):111‐5. - PubMed
Nicholson 2004 {published data only}
    1. Nicholson TJ, Armstrong D. Toical metronidazole (10 per cent) decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain and improved healing. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2004;47(5):711‐6. - PubMed
Olthuis 1968 {published data only}
    1. Olthuis G, Oosterwijk W, Oomen H. The value of chloramphenicol in the prevention of wound infection in abdominal surgery [De waarde van chlooramfenicol voor de profylaxe van wondinfecties bij de buikchirurgie]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1968;112(17):786‐8. - PubMed
Ostergaard 1981 {published data only}
    1. Østergaard A, Wamberg P. Topical or oral antibiotics against wound infection in colorectal surgery. Aktuelle Probleme in Chirurgie und Orthopadie 1981;19:105‐7. - PubMed
Pollock 1975 {published data only}
    1. Pollock A, Evans M. Povidone‐iodine for the control of surgical wound infection: a controlled clinical trial against topical cephaloridine. British Journal of Surgery 1975;62(4):292‐4. - PubMed
Praveen 2009 {published data only}
    1. Praveen S, Rohaizak M. Local antibiotics are equivalent to intravenous antibiotics in the prevention of superficial wound infection in inguinal hernioplasty. Asian Journal of Surgery 2005;32(1):59‐63. - PubMed
Ruschulte 2009 {published data only}
    1. Ruschulte H, Franke M, Gastmeier P, Zenz S, Mahr K, Bucholz S, et al. Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: a randomized controlled trial. Annals of Hematology 2009;88(3):267‐72. - PubMed
Saik 1971 {published data only}
    1. Saik R, Walz C, Rhoads J. Evaluation of a bacitracin‐neomycin surgical skin preparation. The American Journal of Surgery 1971;121(5):557‐60. - PubMed
Sarr 1988 {published data only}
    1. Sarr M, Parikh K, Sanfey H, Minken S, Cameron J. Topical antibiotics in high‐risk biliary surgical patient. The American Journal of Surgery 1988;155(2):337‐42. - PubMed
Stoller 1965 {published data only}
    1. Stoller J. Topical antibiotic therapy in acute appendicitis. The British Journal of Clinical Practice 1965;12(19):687‐8. - PubMed
Tanphiphat 1976 {published data only}
    1. Tanphiphat C, Udomchaya A, Wacharasin T, Suwanpen T, Panichabhongse V, Vajrabukka C. Wound infection in emergency appendectomy: a prospective trial with topical ampicillin and savlon. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 1976;59(8):355‐8. - PubMed
Tanphiphat 1978 {published data only}
    1. Tanphiphat C, Udomchanya S, Wacharasin T, Suwanpen T, Panichabhongse V, Vajrabukka C. Wound infection in emergency appendectomy: a prospective trial with topical ampicillin and savlon. Chotmaihet Thangphaet [Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand] 1978;65(2):89‐91. - PubMed
Taylor 2011 {published data only}
    1. Taylor S, Averyhart A, Heath C. Postprocedural wound‐healing efficacy following removal of dermatosis papulosa nigra lesions in an African American population: a comparison of a skin protectant ointment and a topical antibiotic. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2011;64(3 (Supp)):S30‐5. - PubMed
Thakur 1997 {published data only}
    1. Thakur N. Topical ointments and wound healing. Journal of Family Practice 1997;44(1):26‐7. - PubMed
Theophilus 2011 {published data only}
    1. Theophilus S, Adnan J. A randomised control trial on the use of topical methicillin in reducing post‐operative ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection. Malaysian Journal of Medical Science 2011;18(1):30‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Vander Salm 1989 {published data only}
    1. Vander Salm T, Okike O, Pasque M, Pezzella A, Lew R, Traina V, et al. Reduction of sternal infection by application of topical vancomycin. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1989;98(4):618‐22. - PubMed
Varga 2009 {published data only}
    1. Varga M, Sixta B, Bern R, Adamec M, Jirkovska A. Influence of gentamicincollagen sponge on wound healing after metatarsophalangeal joint resection in diabetic patients. European Wound Management Association Journal 2009;2:Abstract 125.
Wright 1980 {published data only}
    1. Wright V, Hatch L, Lanning N. Use of a topical triple‐antibiotic spray to reduce morbidity from pelvic infection after gynecologic operations. The Canadian Journal of Surgery 1980;23(4):366‐72. - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Ruiz 2015 {published data only}
    1. Ruiz‐Tovar J, Llavero C, Morales V, Gamallo C. Total occlusive ionic silver containing dressing vs. mupirocin ointment application vs. conventional dressing in elective colorectal surgery: Effect on incisional surgical site infection. Journal of American College of Surgeons 2015;221(2):424‐9. - PubMed

Additional references

AEG 2010
    1. Antibiotic Expert Group (AEG). Therapeutic Guidelines: antibiotic. Vol. 14, North Melbourne, Victoria: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited, 2010.
Berger 2000
    1. Berger RS, Pappert AS, Zile PS, Cetnarowski WE. A newly formulated topical triple‐antibiotic ointment minimizes scarring. Cutis 2000;65(6):401‐4. - PubMed
Blondeel 1978
    1. Blondeel A, Oleffe J, Achten G. Contact allergy in 330 dermatological patients. Contact Dermatitis 1978;4(5):270‐6. - PubMed
Bradley 1995
    1. Bradley SF, Ramsey MA, Morton TM, Kauffman CA. Mupirocin resistance: clinical and molecular epidemiology. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1995;16(6):354‐8. - PubMed
Bratzler 2004
    1. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2004;38(12):1706–15. - PubMed
Bruce 2001
    1. Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH. The quality of measurement of surgical wound infection as the basis for monitoring: a systematic review. The Journal of Hospital Infection 2001;49(2):99‐108. - PubMed
CDC 2014
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event. www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf (accessed 25 February 2014).
Cruse 1980
    1. Cruse PJ, Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection: a 10‐year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surgical Clinics of North America 1980;60(1):27‐40. - PubMed
Culver 1991
    1. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. The American Journal of Medicine 1991;91(3):152‐7. - PubMed
Deeks 2011
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Diehr 2007
    1. Diehr S, Hamp A, Jamieson B. Do topical antibiotics improve wound healing?. The Journal of Family Practice 2007;56(2):140‐4. - PubMed
Eaglstein 1980
    1. Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM. 'Inert' vehicles do affect wound healing. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1980;74(2):90‐1. - PubMed
Erel 1999
    1. Erel E, Platt AJ, Ramakrishnan V. Chloramphenicol use in plastic surgery. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 1999;52(4):326‐7. - PubMed
Fukuda 2002
    1. Fukuda M, Ohashi H, Matsumoto C, Mishima S, Shimomura Y. Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin‐resistant coagulase‐negative Staphylococcus ocular surface infection efficacy of chloramphenicol eye drops. Cornea 2002;21(7):86‐9. - PubMed
Geronemus 1979
    1. Geronemus RG, Mertz PM, Eaglstein WH. Wound healing: The effects of topical antimicrobial agents. Archives of Dermatology 1979;115(11):1311‐4. - PubMed
Grey 2009a
    1. Grey J, Healy B, Harding K. Antibiotic prophylaxis for minor dermatological surgery in primary care. BMJ 2009;338:(a2749). - PubMed
HCN 2014
    1. Health Communication Network (HCN), Phoenix Medical Publishing. AusDI ‐ Evidence based medicines information resource. http://www.phoenixmedical.com.au/ausdi.php (accessed 25 February 2014).
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne AC, editor(s). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Hollis 1999
    1. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999;319:670‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Huiras 2012
    1. Huiras P, Logan J, Papadopoulos S, Whitney D. Local antimicrobial administration for prophylaxis of surgical site infections. Review of Therapeutics 2012;32(11):1006‐19. - PubMed
Kasten 1999
    1. Kasten MJ. Clindamycin, metronidazole, and chloramphenicol. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1999;74:825‐33. - PubMed
Kicinski 2015
    1. Kicinski M, Springate DA, Kontopantelis E. Publication bias in meta‐analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Statistics in Medicine 2015;34(20):2781‐93. - PubMed
Kulaylat 2007
    1. Kulaylat M, Dayton M. Surgical Wound Complications. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL editor(s). Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 18th Edition. Philadephia: Saunders Elsevier, 2007:331‐4.
Lefebvre 2011
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J, editor(s). Chapter 6: Searching for studies In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Leyden 1979
    1. Leyden JJ, Kligman AM. Contact dermatitis to neomycin sulfate. JAMA 1979;242(12):1276‐8. - PubMed
Leyden 1987
    1. Leyden JJ, Bartelt NM. Comparison of topical antibiotic ointments, a wound protectant, and antiseptics for the treatment of human blister wounds contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. The Journal of Family Practice 1987;24(6):601‐4. - PubMed
Liberati 2009
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of studies that evaluate health care Interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLOS Med (2009);6(7):e1000100. - PMC - PubMed
Magill 2014
    1. Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati G, Kainer MA, et al. Multistate point‐prevelance survey of health care‐associated infections. The New England Journal of Medicine 2014;370(13):1198‐208. - PMC - PubMed
Mangram 1999
    1. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. American Journal of Infection Control 1999;27(2):97‐132. - PubMed
Maragh 2005
    1. Maragh SL, Otley CC, Roenigk RK, Phillips PK. Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery: updated guidelines. Dermatologic Surgery 2005;31(1):83‐91. - PubMed
Marks 1998
    1. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, Fowler JF, Fransway AF, Maibach HI, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed‐type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1998;38(6):911‐8. - PubMed
McDonnell 1999
    1. McDonnell G, Denver Russell A. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action and resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1999;12(1):147‐79. - PMC - PubMed
McHugh 2011
    1. McHugh S, Collins C, Corrigan M, Hill A, Humphreys H. The role of topical antibiotics used as prophylaxis in surgical site infection prevention. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2011;66(4):693‐701. - PubMed
Messingham 2005
    1. Messingham MJ, Arpey CJ. Update on the use of antibiotics in cutaneous surgery. Dermatologic Surgery 2005;31(8):1068‐78. - PubMed
Miller 1996
    1. Miller MA, Dascal A, Portnoy J, Mendelson J. Development of mupirocin resistance among methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus after widespread use of nasal mupirocin ointment. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1996;17(12):811‐3. - PubMed
NICE 2008
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Surgical site infection (Clinical guideline 74). www.nice.org.uk/CG74 (accessed 25 February 2014).
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Rosengren 2010a
    1. Rosengren H, Dixon A. Antibacterial prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery: an evidence based review. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 2010;11(1):35‐44. - PubMed
Saco 2015
    1. Saco M, Howe N, Nathoo R, Cherpelis B. Topical antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of surgical wound infections from dermatologic procedures: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Dermatolocial Treatment 2015;26(2):151‐8. - PubMed
Saryan 1998
    1. Saryan JA, Dammin TC, Bouras AE. Anaphylaxis to topical bacitracin zinc ointment. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 1998;16(5):512‐3. - PubMed
Schulz 2010
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement. http://www.consort‐statement.org/consort‐2010 (accessed 25 February 2014).
Schünemann 2011a
    1. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JP, Vist GE, Flasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 11: Presenting results and 'Summary of findings' tables. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Schünemann 2011b
    1. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, et al. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
SIGN 2015
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Search filters. http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html#random (accessed 22 March 2016).
Sterne 2000
    1. Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta‐analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2000;53(11):1119‐29. - PubMed
Wright 2008
    1. Wright TI, Baddour LM, Berbari EF, Roenigk RK, Phillips PK, Jacobs MA, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery: advisory statement 2008. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2008;59(3):464‐73. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Heal 2014
    1. Heal C, Driel M, Lepper PD, Banks J. Topical antibiotics for preventing surgical site infection in wounds healing by primary intention. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011426] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources