Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan;24(1):66-71.
doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000303.

Consequences of extracellular trap formation in sepsis

Affiliations
Review

Consequences of extracellular trap formation in sepsis

Xian M O'Brien et al. Curr Opin Hematol. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review will focus on in-vivo findings derived from animal models of sepsis regarding the trapping role of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) which is difficult to assess ex vivo. The NETotic response of neutrophils at sites of sterile injury or autoimmune disease is destructive as no antimicrobial advantage to the host is realized and dampening NETosis is largely beneficial. In early stages of local infection or in sepsis, the trapping function of NETs may help abscess formation and limit microbial dissemination.

Recent findings: The trapping function of NETs limits bacterial dissemination keeping an abscess from becoming bacteremic or confining tissue infection to local sites. Once containment is lost and disease has progressed, the best therapeutic approach suggested by animal studies to date is to inhibit protein arginine deiminase 4 and prevent NETosis rather than attempting to neutralize caustic NET components. Prognostic value may best be realized by taking cell free DNA, citrulllinated histones, neutrophil function and counts of immature granulocytes into consideration rather than rely on any one measure alone.

Summary: The trapping function of NETs may supercede the value of antimicrobial function in the early phases of sepsis such that degradation of the DNA backbone is contraindicated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Vincent J-L, Opal SM, Marshall JC, Tracey KJ. Sepsis definitions: time for change. Lancet (London, England) 2013;381:774–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche J-D, Coopersmith CM, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–10. This report communicates a significant update in definitions and clinical criteria of sepsis. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mayr FB, Yende S, Angus DC. Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence. 2014;5:4–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:862–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angus DC. The search for effective therapy for sepsis: back to the drawing board? JAMA. 2011;306:2614–5. - PubMed