Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Nov 7;16(1):642.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1969-1.

Comparison of DNA testing strategies in monitoring human papillomavirus infection prevalence through simulation

Carol Y Lin  1 , Ling Li  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of DNA testing strategies in monitoring human papillomavirus infection prevalence through simulation

Carol Y Lin et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: HPV DNA diagnostic tests for epidemiology monitoring (research purpose) or cervical cancer screening (clinical purpose) have often been considered separately. Women with positive Linear Array (LA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) research test results typically are neither informed nor referred for colposcopy. Recently, a sequential testing by using Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) HPV clinical test as a triage before genotype by LA has been adopted for monitoring HPV infections. Also, HC2 has been reported as a more feasible screening approach for cervical cancer in low-resource countries. Thus, knowing the performance of testing strategies incorporating HPV clinical test (i.e., HC2-only or using HC2 as a triage before genotype by LA) compared with LA-only testing in measuring HPV prevalence will be informative for public health practice.

Method: We conducted a Monte Carlo simulation study. Data were generated using mathematical algorithms. We designated the reported HPV infection prevalence in the U.S. and Latin America as the "true" underlying type-specific HPV prevalence. Analytical sensitivity of HC2 for detecting 14 high-risk (oncogenic) types was considered to be less than LA. Estimated-to-true prevalence ratios and percentage reductions were calculated.

Results: When the "true" HPV prevalence was designated as the reported prevalence in the U.S., with LA genotyping sensitivity and specificity of (0.95, 0.95), estimated-to-true prevalence ratios of 14 high-risk types were 2.132, 1.056, 0.958 for LA-only, HC2-only, and sequential testing, respectively. Estimated-to-true prevalence ratios of two vaccine-associated high-risk types were 2.359 and 1.063 for LA-only and sequential testing, respectively. When designated type-specific prevalence of HPV16 and 18 were reduced by 50 %, using either LA-only or sequential testing, prevalence estimates were reduced by 18 %.

Conclusion: Estimated-to-true HPV infection prevalence ratios using LA-only testing strategy are generally higher than using HC2-only or using HC2 as a triage before genotype by LA. HPV clinical testing can be incorporated to monitor HPV prevalence or vaccine effectiveness. Caution is needed when comparing apparent prevalence from different testing strategies.

Keywords: Cervical cancer screening; HPV clinical test; HPV prevalence; HPV vaccine effectiveness; PCR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The reported type-specific prevalence of the 14 high-risk (oncogenic) types of the United States and Latin America
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Termrusnfrunglert W, Havanond P, Khemapech N, et al. Cost and effectiveness evaluation of prophylactic HPV vaccine in developing countries. Value Health. 2012;15(1 Suppl):S29–S34. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agosti JM, Goldie SJ. Introducing HPV vaccine in developing countries-key challenges and issues. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1908–10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078053. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flores YN, Bishai DM, Lorincz A, et al. HPV testing for cervical cancer screening appears more cost-effective than Papanicolau cytology in Mexico. Cancer Cause Control. 2011;22:261–272. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9694-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jit M, Demarteau N, Elbasha E, Ginsberg G, Kim J, Praditsitthikorn N, Sinanovic E, Hutubessy R. Human papillomavirus vaccine introduction in low-income and middle-income countries: guidance on the use of cost-effectiveness models. BMC Med. 2011;9:54. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-54. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsiodras S, Georgoulakis J, Chranioti A, Voulgaris Z, Psyrri A, Tsivilika A, Panayiotides J, Karakitsos P. Hybrid capture vs PCR screening of cervical human papilloma virus infections. Cytological and histological associations in 1270 women. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-53. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types