Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Nov 7;16(1):856.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2868-y.

Single administration of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy versus continuous treatment with sorafeNIB in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SIRveNIB): study protocol for a phase iii randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Single administration of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy versus continuous treatment with sorafeNIB in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SIRveNIB): study protocol for a phase iii randomized controlled trial

Mihir Gandhi et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Approximately 20 % of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients diagnosed in the early stages may benefit from potentially curative ablative therapies such as surgical resection, transplantation or radiofrequency ablation. For patients not eligible for such options, prognosis is poor. Sorafenib and Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) are clinically proven treatment options in patients with unresectable HCC, and this study aims to assess overall survival following either SIRT or Sorafenib therapy for locally advanced HCC patients.

Methods: This investigator-initiated, multi-centre, open-label, randomized, controlled trial will enrol 360 patients with locally advanced HCC, as defined by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or stage C, without distant metastases, and which is not amenable to immediate curative treatment. Exclusion criteria include previous systemic therapy, metastatic disease, complete occlusion of the main portal vein, or a Child-Pugh score of >7. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 and stratified by centre and presence or absence of portal vein thrombosis to receive either a single administration of SIRT using yttrium-90 resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres®, Sirtex Medical Limited, Sydney, Australia) targeted at HCC in the liver by the trans-arterial route or continuous oral Sorafenib (Nexavar®, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) at a dose of 400 mg twice daily until disease progression, no further response, complete regression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients for both the Sorafenib and SIRT arms will be followed-up every 4 weeks for the first 3 months and 12 weekly thereafter. Overall survival is the primary endpoint, assessed for the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints are tumour response rate, time-to-tumour progression, progression free survival, quality of life and down-staging to receive potentially curative therapy.

Discussion: Definitive data comparing these two therapies will help to determine clinical practice in the large group of patients with locally advanced HCC and improve outcomes for such patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01135056 , first received 24, May 2010.

Keywords: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma; Asia-Pacific; Liver cancer; Phase III; Radioembolisation; Randomized controlled trial; SIR-Spheres; Selective internal radiation therapy; Sorafenib; Systemic therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the SIRveNIB trial design. ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PVT, portal vein thrombosis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Venook AP, Papandreou C, Furuse J, de Guevara LL. The incidence and epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: a global and regional perspective. Oncologist. 2010;15(Suppl 4):5–13. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-S4-05. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGlynn KA, Tsao L, Hsing AW, Devesa SS, Fraumeni JF., Jr International trends and patterns of primary liver cancer. Int J Cancer J Int du Cancer. 2001;94(2):290–6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1456. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J, Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer G The Barcelona approach: diagnosis, staging, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2004;10(2 Suppl 1):S115–20. doi: 10.1002/lt.20034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hung H. Treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2005;5(2):131–8. doi: 10.2174/1568009053202063. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poon D, Anderson BO, Chen LT, Tanaka K, Lau WY, Van Cutsem E, Singh H, Chow WC, Ooi LL, Chow P, et al. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia: consensus statement from the Asian Oncology Summit 2009. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(11):1111–8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70241-4. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data