Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):1140.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3799-x.

Power, fairness and trust: understanding and engaging with vaccine trial participants and communities in the setting up the EBOVAC-Salone vaccine trial in Sierra Leone

Affiliations

Power, fairness and trust: understanding and engaging with vaccine trial participants and communities in the setting up the EBOVAC-Salone vaccine trial in Sierra Leone

Luisa Enria et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: This paper discusses the establishment of a clinical trial of an Ebola vaccine candidate in Kambia District, Northern Sierra Leone during the epidemic, and analyses the role of social science research in ensuring that lessons from the socio-political context, the recent experience of the Ebola outbreak, and learning from previous clinical trials were incorporated in the development of community engagement strategies. The paper aims to provide a case study of an integrated social science and communications system in the start-up phase of the clinical trial.

Methods: The paper is based on qualitative research methods including ethnographic observation, interviews with trial participants and key stakeholder interviews.

Results: Through the case study of EBOVAC Salone, the paper suggests ways in which research can be used to inform communication strategies before and during the setting up of the trial. It explores notions of power, fairness and trust emerging from analysis of the Sierra Leonean context and through ethnographic research, to reflect on three situations in which social scientists and community liaison officers worked together to ensure successful community engagement. Firstly, a section on "power" considers the pitfalls of considering communities as homogeneous and shows the importance of understanding intra-community power dynamics when engaging communities. Secondly, a section on "fairness" shows how local understandings of what is fair can help inform the design of volunteer recruitment strategies. Finally, a section on "trust" highlights how historically rooted rumours can be effectively addressed through active dialogue rather than through an approach focused on correcting misinformation.

Conclusion: The paper firstly emphasises the value of social science in the setting up of clinical trials, in terms of providing an in depth understanding of context and social dynamics. Secondly, the paper suggests the importance of a close collaboration between research and community engagement to effectively confront political and social dynamics, especially in the context of an epidemic.

Keywords: Anthropology; Community engagement; Ebola; Sierra Leone; Vaccine trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Health Organisation (WHO). Ebola Situation Report - 10 June 2016, vol. 2016. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Available at: World Health Organisation (WHO) 2016. Accessed 15 June 2016.
    1. Centre for Disease Control (CDC) 2014 Ebola Outbreak in West Africa - Case Counts. 2016.
    1. Bedford J. Resistance in Guinea. Accra: UNMEER Briefs; 2015.
    1. Fairheard J. Understanding social resistance to Ebola response in Guinea. 2015.
    1. Peters M. Community Perceptions of Ebola Response Efforts in Liberia: Montserrado and Nimba Counties. Oxford: Oxfam GB; 2014.