Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec 19;371(1710):20150408.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0408.

Chirality of the cytoskeleton in the origins of cellular asymmetry

Affiliations
Review

Chirality of the cytoskeleton in the origins of cellular asymmetry

Peter Satir. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Self-assembly of two important components of the cytoskeleton of eukaryotic cells, actin microfilaments and microtubules (MTs) results in polar filaments of one chirality. As is true for bacterial flagella, in actin microfilaments, screw direction is important for assembly processes and motility. For MTs, polar orientation within the cell is paramount. The alignment of these elements in the cell cytoplasm gives rise to emergent properties, including the potential for cell differentiation and specialization. Complex MTs with a characteristic chirality are found in basal bodies and centrioles; this chirality is preserved in cilia. In motile cilia, it is reflected in the direction of the effective stroke. The positioning of the basal body or cilia on the cell surface depends on polarity proteins. In evolution, survival depends on global polarity information relayed to the cell in part by orientation of the MT and actin filament cytoskeletons and the chirality of the basal body to determine left and right coordinates within a defined anterior-posterior cell and tissue axis.This article is part of the themed issue 'Provocative questions in left-right asymmetry'.

Keywords: actin filament; asymmetry; bacterial flagellum; basal body; cilia; microtubules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Diagrams of Tetmemena oral apparatus showing basal body arrangement and ciliary numbering (a) wt left side of mirror image cell (b) mirror image right side, actual arrangement due to 180° rotation with no change of basal body chirality (c) hypothetical true mirror image of wt using reversed basal body chirality. (1) The basal body. Seen from outside the cell looking inward (tip to base). In (a) and (b), the basal body is drawn as observed with its true universal chirality. Looking tip to base, subfibres B and C of the triplet MT lie clockwise to subfibre A, the complete 13 protofilament MT. Attached to the basal body is the dense triangular basal foot that identifies the direction of the effective stroke of the cilia that grow on these basal bodies. This is reversed by the 180° in (b). In (c), the true mirror image requires a reversed basal body chirality where looking tip to base, subfibres B and C run anticlockwise from subfibre A, which is never observed in any cell. (2) The arrangement of the rows of basal bodies in the oral apparatus. The rotation in (b) requires a different order of morphogenesis. (3) The ciliary stroke. Solid lines indicate the effective stroke with direction of beat shown. Dashed lines indicate the recovery stroke. The 180° rotation reverses the direction of the effective stroke. (4) The direction of the current created by the cilia (black arrow). The current brings food into the wt oral apparatus and the cytostome. (5) The 9 + 2 ciliary cross-section with the doublets numbered. The chirality of the basal body is maintained. Looking tip to base, dynein arms occupy the free side of suberfibre A and run anticlockwise toward the adjacent subfibre B. The effective stroke is in the direction of doublets 5–6. (6) Positional coordinates of the oral apparatus with respect to the cell: A, anterior; L, left. Reproduced from Bell et al., [42] with permission. Courtesy A. Bell and Develop. Biol. (Online version in colour.)

References

    1. Macnab RM. 1999. The bacterial flagellum: reversible rotary propellor and type III export apparatus. J. Bacteriol. 181, 7149–7153. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Samatey FA, Imada K, Nagashima S, Vonderviszt F, Kumasaka T, Yamamoto M, Namba K. 2001. Structure of the bacterial flagellar protofilament and implications for a switch for supercoiling. Nature 410, 331–337. (10.1038/35066504) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nishizaka T, Yagi T, Tanaka Y, Ishiwata S. 1993. Right-handed rotation of an actin filament in an in vitro motile system. Nature 361, 269–271. (10.1038/361269a0) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yanagida T. 2007. Muscle contraction mechanism based on actin filament rotation. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 592, 359–367. (10.1007/978-4-431-38453-3_30) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Noji H, Yasuda R, Yoshida M, Kinosita K Jr. 1997. Direct observation of the rotation of F1-ATPase. Nature 386, 299–302. (10.1038/386299a0) - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources