Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct 25:8:613-619.
doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S99507. eCollection 2016.

The Danish Registry of Diabetic Retinopathy

Nis Andersen  1 , Jesper Østergaard Hjortdal  2 , Katja Christina Schielke  3 , Toke Bek  4 , Jakob Grauslund  5 , Caroline Schmidt Laugesen  6 , Henrik Lund-Andersen  7 , Charlotte Cerqueira  8 , Jens Andresen  9
Affiliations
Review

The Danish Registry of Diabetic Retinopathy

Nis Andersen et al. Clin Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Aim of database: To monitor the development of diabetic eye disease in Denmark and to evaluate the accessibility and effectiveness of diabetic eye screening programs with focus on interregional variations.

Target population: The target population includes all patients diagnosed with diabetes. Denmark (5.5 million inhabitants) has ~320,000 diabetes patients with an annual increase of 27,000 newly diagnosed patients. The Danish Registry of Diabetic Retinopathy (DiaBase) collects data on all diabetes patients aged ≥18 years who attend screening for diabetic eye disease in hospital eye departments and in private ophthalmological practice. In 2014-2015, DiaBase included data collected from 77,968 diabetes patients.

Main variables: The main variables provide data for calculation of performance indicators to monitor the quality of diabetic eye screening and development of diabetic retinopathy. Data with respect to age, sex, best corrected visual acuity, screening frequency, grading of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy at each visit, progression/regression of diabetic eye disease, and prevalence of blindness were obtained. Data analysis from DiaBase's latest annual report (2014-2015) indicates that the prevalence of no diabetic retinopathy, nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy is 78%, 18%, and 4%, respectively. The percentage of patients without diabetic maculopathy is 97%. The proportion of patients with regression of diabetic retinopathy (20%) is greater than the proportion of patients with progression of diabetic retinopathy (10%).

Conclusion: The collection of data from diabetic eye screening is still expanding in Denmark. Analysis of the data collected during the period 2014-2015 reveals an overall decrease of diabetic retinopathy compared to the previous year, although the number of patients newly diagnosed with diabetes has been increasing in Denmark. DiaBase is a useful tool to observe the quality of screening, prevalence, and progression/regression of diabetic eye disease.

Keywords: Danish Diabetes Database; DiaBase; database; diabetes; national annual report; quality indicator; quality of care; registry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KC Schielke is an advisory board member of Bayer. J Grauslund is an advisory board member of Allergan, Bayer, and Novartis Healthcare. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy II. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(4):520–526. - PubMed
    1. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(4):527–532. - PubMed
    1. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. London: [Accessed August 1, 2015]. (Diabetic Retinopathy Guidelines 2012). [updated July 2013]. Available from: https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/standards-publications-research/clinical-guide...
    1. Aspelund T, Thornórisdóttir O, Olafsdottir E, et al. Individual risk assessment and information technology to optimise screening frequency for diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia. 2011;54(10):2525–2532. - PubMed
    1. Dansk Oftalmologisk Selskab: Kliniske retningslinier for diabetisk øjensygdom – retningslinier for screening, forebyggelse og behandling [Clinical guidelines for diabetic eye disease – Guidelines for screening, prevention and treatment] 2009. [Accessed August 1, 2015]. Available from: http://www.dansk-oftalmologisk-selskab.dk/arkiver/486. Danish.