An indication of current views of Australian general practitioners towards chiropractic and osteopathy: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 27822360
- PMCID: PMC5088656
- DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0119-6
An indication of current views of Australian general practitioners towards chiropractic and osteopathy: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: While the role of complementary medicine therapies such as chiropractic and osteopathy is yet to be clearly delineated in the Australian context, demand for these services remains high. The attitudes of general practitioners towards chiropractors and osteopaths may have played a part in producing this outcome. However, this view is based on data that were more than 10 years old. Current anecdotal evidence suggests that the previous level of support may be declining in sections of the Australian medical profession. An assessment of the current views of general practitioners towards chiropractors and osteopaths is called for. The results being reported here represent the first stage of this assessment.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was designed as a quantitative descriptive study using an anonymous online survey that included closed and open-ended questions with opportunities provided for free text. The target population was Australian general practitioners. Inclusion criteria included current medical registration, membership of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and currently practicing as a general practitioner in Australia. The data being reported here were collected between May and December, 2014.
Results: There were 630 respondents to the online survey during this period representing a response rate of 2.6 %. Results were not uniform for the two professions. More general practitioners believed chiropractic education was not evidence-based compared to osteopathic education (70 % and 50 % respectively) while scope of practice was viewed as similar for both professions. A majority of general practitioners had never referred a patient to either profession (chiropractic: 60 %; osteopathy: 66 %) with approximately two-thirds not interested in learning more about their education (chiropractors: 68 %; osteopaths: 63 %).
Conclusions: This study provides an indication of the current views of Australian general practitioners towards chiropractors and osteopaths. The findings suggest that attitudes may have become less favourable with a growing intolerance towards both professions. If confirmed, this has the potential to impact health service provision. The results from this cross-sectional study suggest that obtaining representative general practitioner views using online surveys is difficult and another approach is needed to supplement or replace the current recruitment strategy.'
Keywords: Chiropractic; Complementary Medicine; General Practitioners; Osteopathy.
Similar articles
-
Themes Underlying Australian General Practitioner Views towards Chiropractic and Osteopathy: An Assessment of Free Text Data from a Cross-Sectional Survey.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Jan 14;2018:2786106. doi: 10.1155/2018/2786106. eCollection 2018. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018. PMID: 29552080 Free PMC article.
-
Referrals to chiropractors and osteopaths: a survey of general practitioners in rural and regional New South Wales, Australia.Chiropr Man Therap. 2013 Jan 31;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-5. Chiropr Man Therap. 2013. PMID: 23369205 Free PMC article.
-
Complaints about chiropractors, osteopaths, and physiotherapists: a retrospective cohort study of health, performance, and conduct concerns.Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 Apr 12;26:12. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0180-4. eCollection 2018. Chiropr Man Therap. 2018. PMID: 29682278 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and characteristics of women who consult with osteopathic practitioners during pregnancy; a report from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH).J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016 Jan;20(1):168-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 21. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016. PMID: 26891652 Review.
-
Pain research in complementary and alternative medicine in Australia: a critical review.J Altern Complement Med. 2013 Feb;19(2):81-91. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0233. Epub 2012 Aug 14. J Altern Complement Med. 2013. PMID: 22891634 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Factors that influence scope of practice of the chiropractic profession in Australia: a scoping review.Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 Apr 14;30(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00428-2. Chiropr Man Therap. 2022. PMID: 35421996 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of Chiropractic-Specific Terminology on Chiropractors' Websites in the United Kingdom With Comparison to Australia: An Analysis of Samples.J Chiropr Humanit. 2021 Dec 22;28:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.echu.2021.10.001. eCollection 2021 Dec. J Chiropr Humanit. 2021. PMID: 35002574 Free PMC article.
-
Osteopathy Referrals to and from General Practitioners: Secondary Analysis of Practitioner Characteristics from an Australian Practice-Based Research Network.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 25;12(1):48. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010048. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38200954 Free PMC article.
-
Themes Underlying Australian General Practitioner Views towards Chiropractic and Osteopathy: An Assessment of Free Text Data from a Cross-Sectional Survey.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Jan 14;2018:2786106. doi: 10.1155/2018/2786106. eCollection 2018. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018. PMID: 29552080 Free PMC article.
-
The management of common recurrent headaches by chiropractors: a descriptive analysis of a nationally representative survey.BMC Neurol. 2018 Oct 17;18(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1173-6. BMC Neurol. 2018. PMID: 30332996 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Health and Medical Research Council . Complementary medicines. 2015.
-
- Allied Health Professions Australia. http://www.ahpa.com.au/Membership/MembershipOrganisations.aspx. Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
-
- Friends of Science in Medicine . Quack treatments duck for cover. 2012.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources