Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr;41(4):899-913.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3807-4.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs Improve Patient Outcomes and Recovery: A Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs Improve Patient Outcomes and Recovery: A Meta-analysis

Christine S M Lau et al. World J Surg. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been developed to improve patient outcomes, accelerate recovery after surgery, and reduce healthcare costs. ERAS programs are a multimodal approach, with interventions during all stages of care. This meta-analysis examines the impact of ERAS programs on patient outcomes and recovery.

Methods: A comprehensive search of all published randomized control trials (RCTs) assessing the use of ERAS programs in surgical patients was conducted. Outcomes analyzed were length of stay (LOS), overall mortality, 30-day readmission rates, total costs, total complications, time to first flatus, and time to first bowel movement.

Results: Forty-two RCTs involving 5241 patients were analyzed. ERAS programs significantly reduced LOS, total complications, and total costs across all types of surgeries (p < 0.001). Return of gastrointestinal (GI) function was also significantly improved, as measured by earlier time to first flatus and time to first bowel movement, p < 0.001. There was no overall difference in mortality or 30-day readmission rates; however, 30-day readmission rates after upper GI surgeries nearly doubled with the use of ERAS programs (RR = 1.922; p = 0.019).

Conclusions: ERAS programs are associated with a significant reduction in LOS, total complications, total costs, as well as earlier return of GI function. Overall mortality and readmission rates remained similar, but there was a significant increase in 30-day readmission rates after upper GI surgeries. ERAS programs are effective and a valuable part in improving patient outcomes and accelerating recovery after surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Resuscitation. 2012 Feb;83(2):188-96 - PubMed
    1. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Oct;59(119):2158-63 - PubMed
    1. Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Apr 27;3 Suppl 2:S13-20 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Mar;222(3):219-25 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2009 Mar;33(3):577-85 - PubMed