Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 4:9:236.
doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0634-7. eCollection 2016.

Piezo-tolerant natural gas-producing microbes under accumulating p CO2

Affiliations

Piezo-tolerant natural gas-producing microbes under accumulating p CO2

Ralph E F Lindeboom et al. Biotechnol Biofuels. .

Abstract

Background: It is known that a part of natural gas is produced by biogenic degradation of organic matter, but the microbial pathways resulting in the formation of pressurized gas fields remain unknown. Autogeneration of biogas pressure of up to 20 bar has been shown to improve the quality of biogas to the level of biogenic natural gas as the fraction of CO2 decreased. Still, the pCO2 is higher compared to atmospheric digestion and this may affect the process in several ways. In this work, we investigated the effect of elevated pCO2 of up to 0.5 MPa on Gibbs free energy, microbial community composition and substrate utilization kinetics in autogenerative high-pressure digestion.

Results: In this study, biogas pressure (up to 2.0 MPa) was batch-wise autogenerated for 268 days at 303 K in an 8-L bioreactor, resulting in a population dominated by archaeal Methanosaeta concilii, Methanobacterium formicicum and Mtb. beijingense and bacterial Kosmotoga-like (31% of total bacterial species), Propioniferax-like (25%) and Treponema-like (12%) species. Related microorganisms have also been detected in gas, oil and abandoned coal-bed reservoirs, where elevated pressure prevails. After 107 days autogeneration of biogas pressure up to 0.50 MPa of pCO2, propionate accumulated whilst CH4 formation declined. Alongside the Propioniferax-like organism, a putative propionate producer, increased in relative abundance in the period of propionate accumulation. Complementary experiments showed that specific propionate conversion rates decreased linearly from 30.3 mg g-1 VSadded day-1 by more than 90% to 2.2 mg g-1 VSadded day-1 after elevating pCO2 from 0.10 to 0.50 MPa. Neither thermodynamic limitations, especially due to elevated pH2, nor pH inhibition could sufficiently explain this phenomenon. The reduced propionate conversion could therefore be attributed to reversible CO2-toxicity.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest a generic role of the detected bacterial and archaeal species in biogenic methane formation at elevated pressure. The propionate conversion rate and subsequent methane production rate were inhibited by up to 90% by the accumulating pCO2 up to 0.5 MPa in the pressure reactor, which opens opportunities for steering carboxylate production using reversible CO2-toxicity in mixed-culture microbial electrosynthesis and fermentation.Graphical abstractThe role of pCO2 in steering product formation in autogenerative high pressure digestion.

Keywords: Autogenerative high-pressure digestion; CO2-toxicity; Carboxylate platform; Gibbs free energy; Population dynamics; Propionate accumulation; Syntrophy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
The role of pCO2 in steering product formation in autogenerative high pressure digestion
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of experimental design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Results of fed-batch reactor operation. a Pressure and pH, b measured pCH4, measured pCO2 and calculated pCO2, c acetate and propionate; downward arrow indicates H2 addition; P1–P6 indicate operational periods as described in Table 1
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
FESEM micrographs from representative reactor samples. Rod (A), and filamentous (B) shaped (left) and coccus (C), spiral-shaped (D) organisms (middle). Smooth and tubular pore (E) cell surfaces are magnified on the right
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Archaeal and bacterial DGGE profiles and heat maps. Archaeal (a) and bacterial (c) DGGE profiles and heat maps of the relative intensities of major archaeal (b) and bacterial (d) DGGE bands. Numbered bands in a indicate the positions identical to the migration of clone samples closely related to (1–3) Methanosaeta concilii, (4) Methanobacterium formicicum, (5) Methanoregula boonei and/or Methanosarcina acetivorans, and (6) Methanoregula boonei and/or Methanobacterium formicicum. Numbered bands in b indicate the positions identical to the migration of clone samples closely related to (1) Brachymonas denitrificans and Tessaracoccus (2) Propionibacteriaceae, (3) Treponema, (4) Bacteroidales, (5) Bacteroidales and Victivallis, (6) Succiniclasticum, (7) Propioniferax, (8) Petrimonas, (9) Synergistaceae, Brachymonas denitrificans and Tessaracoccus, (10) Kosmotoga, (11) Clostridium quinii and Clostridia, and (12) Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans. Each band in c and d is labelled with the clone(s) with an identical migration pattern, followed in parentheses by the affiliation of the clone determined by Ribosomal Database Project classifier. Numbers indicate ratio (%) over the sum of band intensities of each sample (i.e., each lane in DGGE). P1–P6 and II, IV indicate operational periods and experiments described in Table 1
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Neighbour-joining tree illustrating the phylogenetic identities of archaeal communities in the pressure bioreactor. The archaeal 16S rRNA gene fragments were obtained from clone samples. Clone counts of each OTU are given in brackets; the first and the second numbers indicate the counts derived from samples A and L, respectively. Numbers at nodes are bootstrap values derived from 100 analyses. The scale bar represents an amount of nucleotide sequence change of 0.02
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Neighbour-joining tree illustrating the phylogenetic identities of bacterial communities in the pressure bioreactor. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene fragments were obtained from clone samples. Clone counts of each OTU are given in brackets; numbers in series indicate the counts derived from samples F, L and U, respectively. Numbers at nodes are bootstrap values derived from 100 analyses. The scale bar represents an amount of nucleotide sequence change of 0.03
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Results of the propionate degradation experiments (experiment III) under different pCO2 conditions. a Propionate degradation profiles under different pCO2 conditions. b Both acetate and propionate profiles of 0.50 MPa trial are shown for representation. Dashed lines represent curve fittings using modified Gompertz model

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Collett TS. Energy resource potential of natural gas hydrates. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull. 2002;86:1971–1992.
    1. Kinnaman TC. The economic impact of shale gas extraction: a review of existing studies. Ecol Econ. 2011;70:1243–1249. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.005. - DOI
    1. Strąpoć D, Mastalerz M, Dawson K, Macalady J, Callaghan AV, Wawrik B, Turich C, Ashby M. Biogeochemistry of microbial coal-bed methane. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2011;39:617–656. doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-040610-133343. - DOI
    1. Wellinger A, Lindberg A. Biogas upgrading and utilisation. In: Bioenergy task 24: energy from biological conversion of organic waste. International Energy Agency; 2001. http://www.ieabioenergy.com.
    1. Rice DD, Claypool GE. Generation, accumulation, and resource potential of biogenic gas. AAPG Bull. 1981;65:5–25.

LinkOut - more resources