Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan;9(1):3-14.
doi: 10.4168/aair.2017.9.1.3.

Development of New Therapies for Severe Asthma

Affiliations
Review

Development of New Therapies for Severe Asthma

Merritt L Fajt et al. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Persistent asthma has long been treated with inhaled corticosteroids (CSs), as the mainstay of therapy. However, their efficacy in patients with more severe disease is limited, which led to the incorporation of poor response to ICSs (and thereby use of high doses of ICS) into recent definitions of severe asthma. Several studies have suggested that severe asthma might consist of several different phenotypes, each with ongoing symptoms and health care utilization, despite the use of high doses of ICS, usually in combination with a second or third controller. Several new therapies have been approved for severe asthma. Long-acting muscarinic agents have recently been approved as an additional controller agent and appear to improve lung function, although their effect on symptoms and exacerbations is less. Although bronchial thermoplasty (BT) has emerged as a therapy for severe asthma, little is understood regarding the appropriate selection of these patients. Considerable data have emerged to support the presence of a group of patients with severe asthma who have ongoing Type 2 inflammation. These patients appear to respond to targeted biologic approaches which are at the current time mostly investigational. In contrast, few effective therapies for patients with less or no evidence for Type 2 inflammation have emerged. Many new and exciting therapies are at the forefront for severe asthma therapy and, in conjunction with precision medicine approaches to identify the group of patients likely to respond to these approaches, will change the way we think about treating severe asthma.

Keywords: Severe asthma; Type 2 inflammation; asthma phenotype; biologic medications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no financial or other issues that might lead to conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure
Figure. Selected therapeutic targets in severe ashtma.

References

    1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma: expert panel report 3 [Internet] Bethesda (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2007. [cited 2015 Nov 11]. Available from: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    1. Chung KF, Wenzel S European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society Severe Asthma International Guidelines Task Force. From the authors: International European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guidelines on severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:1378–1379. - PubMed
    1. Wenzel SE, Busse WW National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Severe Asthma Research Program. Severe asthma: lessons from the Severe Asthma Research Program. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119:14–21. - PubMed
    1. Brown HM. Treatment of chronic asthma with prednisolone; significance of eosinophils in the sputum. Lancet. 1958;2:1245–1247. - PubMed
    1. Pavord ID, Brightling CE, Woltmann G, Wardlaw AJ. Non-eosinophilic corticosteroid unresponsive asthma. Lancet. 1999;353:2213–2214. - PubMed