Development of a source-exposure matrix for occupational exposure assessment of electromagnetic fields in the INTEROCC study
- PMID: 27827378
- PMCID: PMC5573206
- DOI: 10.1038/jes.2016.60
Development of a source-exposure matrix for occupational exposure assessment of electromagnetic fields in the INTEROCC study
Erratum in
-
Correction: Development of a source-exposure matrix for occupational exposure assessment of electromagnetic fields in the INTEROCC study.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;29(5):731. doi: 10.1038/s41370-019-0130-9. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 30886317
-
Author Correction: Development of a source-exposure matrix for occupational exposure assessment of electromagnetic fields in the INTEROCC study.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;29(6):860. doi: 10.1038/s41370-019-0133-6. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 30899068
Abstract
To estimate occupational exposures to electromagnetic fields (EMF) for the INTEROCC study, a database of source-based measurements extracted from published and unpublished literature resources had been previously constructed. The aim of the current work was to summarize these measurements into a source-exposure matrix (SEM), accounting for their quality and relevance. A novel methodology for combining available measurements was developed, based on order statistics and log-normal distribution characteristics. Arithmetic and geometric means, and estimates of variability and maximum exposure were calculated by EMF source, frequency band and dosimetry type. The mean estimates were weighted by our confidence in the pooled measurements. The SEM contains confidence-weighted mean and maximum estimates for 312 EMF exposure sources (from 0 Hz to 300 GHz). Operator position geometric mean electric field levels for radiofrequency (RF) sources ranged between 0.8 V/m (plasma etcher) and 320 V/m (RF sealer), while magnetic fields ranged from 0.02 A/m (speed radar) to 0.6 A/m (microwave heating). For extremely low frequency sources, electric fields ranged between 0.2 V/m (electric forklift) and 11,700 V/m (high-voltage transmission line-hotsticks), whereas magnetic fields ranged between 0.14 μT (visual display terminals) and 17 μT (tungsten inert gas welding). The methodology developed allowed the construction of the first EMF-SEM and may be used to summarize similar exposure data for other physical or chemical agents.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures



References
-
- Sauvé J-F, Beaudry C, Bégin D, Dion C, Gérin M, Lavoué J. Statistical modeling of crystalline silica exposure by trade in the construction industry using a database compiled from the literature. J Environ Monit JEM. 2012;14:2512–2520. - PubMed
-
- Sauvé J-F, Beaudry C, Bégin D, Dion C, Gérin M, Lavoué J. Silica exposure during construction activities: statistical modeling of task-based measurements from the literature. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;57:432–443. - PubMed
-
- Hein MJ, Waters MA, van Wijngaarden E, Deddens JA, Stewart PA. Issues when modeling benzene, toluene, and xylene exposures using a literature database. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008;5:36–47. - PubMed
Bibliography
-
- Aitchison J, Brown JAC. The lognormal distribution. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1957.
-
- Bowman JD, Vila J. How Euclid’s “mean proportional” became an estimation technique for modern scientists. 2016. Unpublished manuscript.
-
- Bowman JD, Sivaganesan S, Shulman SA, Cardis E on behalf of the INTEROCC Study Group. A new method for evaluating the judgment’s variability and uncertainty. 2013. Expert judgments of occupational exposures to electric and magnetic fields: I. Unpublished manuscript.
-
- Harrell FE, Jr with contributions from Charles Dupont and many others. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 3.17-0. 2015 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc.
-
- Harter HL. Expected values of normal order statistics. Biometrika. 1961;48:151–165.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical