Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 10:(1):7-12.
doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-023.

New Unintended Adverse Consequences of Electronic Health Records

D F Sittig  1 , A Wright, J Ash, H Singh
Affiliations

New Unintended Adverse Consequences of Electronic Health Records

D F Sittig et al. Yearb Med Inform. .

Abstract

Although the health information technology industry has made considerable progress in the design, development, implementation, and use of electronic health records (EHRs), the lofty expectations of the early pioneers have not been met. In 2006, the Provider Order Entry Team at Oregon Health & Science University described a set of unintended adverse consequences (UACs), or unpredictable, emergent problems associated with computer-based provider order entry implementation, use, and maintenance. Many of these originally identified UACs have not been completely addressed or alleviated, some have evolved over time, and some new ones have emerged as EHRs became more widely available. The rapid increase in the adoption of EHRs, coupled with the changes in the types and attitudes of clinical users, has led to several new UACs, specifically: complete clinical information unavailable at the point of care; lack of innovations to improve system usability leading to frustrating user experiences; inadvertent disclosure of large amounts of patient-specific information; increased focus on computer-based quality measurement negatively affecting clinical workflows and patient-provider interactions; information overload from marginally useful computer-generated data; and a decline in the development and use of internally-developed EHRs. While each of these new UACs poses significant challenges to EHR developers and users alike, they also offer many opportunities. The challenge for clinical informatics researchers is to continue to refine our current systems while exploring new methods of overcoming these challenges and developing innovations to improve EHR interoperability, usability, security, functionality, clinical quality measurement, and information summarization and display.

Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs); confidentiality; data display; medical informatics; quality indicators; usability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) VT100 terminal. (from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_interface)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. France FR. eHealth in Belgium, a new “secure” federal network: role of patients, health professions and social security services. Int J Med Inform 2011;80:e12–6 - PubMed
    1. Protti D, Johansen I. Widespread adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in Denmark: a case study. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2010;80:1–14. Available at: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Issue%20Brief... (Accessed 1/7/2015). - PubMed
    1. Australian Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA). HealthConnect Evaluation. 24 August 2009. Available: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/Publishing.nsf/Content/FAFD8FE-99... (Accessed 1/7/2016).
    1. Price M, Singer A, Kim J. Adopting electronic medical records: are they just electronic paper records? Can Fam Physician 2013. July;59(7):e322-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty M, Rasmussen P, Pierson R, et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012. December;31(12):2805-16. - PubMed