Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;15(23):3203-3209.
doi: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1241915. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

Silencing of CDK2, but not CDK1, separates mitogenic from anti-apoptotic signaling, sensitizing p53 defective cells for synthetic lethality

Affiliations

Silencing of CDK2, but not CDK1, separates mitogenic from anti-apoptotic signaling, sensitizing p53 defective cells for synthetic lethality

Tatyana S Nekova et al. Cell Cycle. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Small molecule inhibitors targeting CDK1/CDK2 have been clinically proven effective against a variety of tumors, albeit at the cost of profound off target toxicities. To separate potential therapeutic from toxic effects, we selectively knocked down CDK1 or CDK2 in p53 mutated HACAT cells by siRNA silencing. Using dynamic, cell cycle wide proteome arrays, we observed minor changes in overall abundance of proteins critically involved in cell cycle transition despite profound G2/M or G1/S arrest, respectively. Employing phospho site specific analyses, we identified uncoupled mitogenic, yet pro-apoptotic signaling from counter balancing anti-apoptotic activity in CDK2 disrupted cells. Moreover, a crucial role of CDK2 activity in early serum response was observed, extending well-established roles of CDKs outside their cell cycle regulating functions. In contrast, disruption of CDK1 only marginally affected phosphorylation events of crucial signaling nodes prior to G2/S transition. The data presented here suggest that the temporal separation of pro- and anti-apoptotic pathways by selective inhibition of CDK2 disrupts coherent signaling modules and may synergize with anti-proliferative drugs, averting toxic side effects from CDK1 inhibition.

Keywords: CDK1; CDK2; HACAT; cell cycle; p53; phosphorylation; serine-threonine kinase; signaling pathway; tyrosine kinase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kinetics of CDK1 and CDK2 inhibition by siRNA. HACAT cells were transiently transfected with CDK1 or CDK2 siRNA (75 nM) and non-target control siRNA, synchronized for 48 hours by serum starvation, followed by G1-release after addition of serum-containing medium. Protein levels of CDK1 and CDK2 were analyzed by western blot. Tubulin was used as loading control. The images are representative of at least 3 series of different experiments with various concentrations of siRNA (25-75nM) and time points (24 to 84 hours).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cell cycle analysis in CDK1 and CDK2-deficient cells. HACAT cells were transiently transfected with CDK1 or CDK2 siRNA (75 nM) and non-target control siRNA, synchronized for 48 hours by serum starvation, followed by G1-release after addition of serum-containing medium. Distribution of cells into distinct cell cycle phases was analyzed by propidium iodide staining using flow cytometry techniques. Histogram plots are representative of 3 comparable experiments.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cell cycle wide dynamics of proteins and phosphorylated proteins in CDK1 and CDK2 depleted HACAT cells. Heat map analysis with k-means clustering of 248 phospho- and total proteins, expressed as log2-values, row-wise scaling. Each row corresponds to the same protein order. Expression levels of low intensities are colored in blue, high intensities are colored in yellow. The results are from one single representative experiment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Canavese M, Santo L, Raje N. Cyclin dependent kinases in cancer: potential for therapeutic intervention. Cancer Biol Ther 2012; 13(7):451-7; PMID:22361734; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cbt.19589 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts PJ, Bisi JE, Strum JC, Combest AJ, Darr DB, Usary JE, Zamboni WC, Wong KK, Perou CM, Sharpless NE. Multiple roles of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in cancer therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104(6):476-87; PMID:22302033; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar SK, LaPlant B, Chng WJ, Zonder J, Callander N, Fonseca R, Fruth B, Roy V, Erlichman C, Stewart AK. Dinaciclib, a novel CDK inhibitor, demonstrates encouraging single-agent activity in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood 2015; 125(3):443-8; PMID:25395429; http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-05-573741 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Criscitiello C, Viale G, Esposito A, Curigliano G. Dinaciclib for the treatment of breast cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2014; 23(9):1305-12; PMID:25107301; http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/13543784.2014.948152 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malumbres M. Cyclin-dependent kinases. Genome Biol 2014; 15(6):122; PMID:25180339; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb4184 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances