Reconstruction Outcomes Following Lateral Skull Base Resection
- PMID: 27832006
- PMCID: PMC8547891
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001279
Reconstruction Outcomes Following Lateral Skull Base Resection
Abstract
Objective: Compare reconstruction outcomes for various lateral skull base closure techniques.
Study design: Retrospective medical records review.
Setting: University-based tertiary referral center.
Patients: Patients who underwent resections of tumors involving the lateral skull base requiring reconstruction beyond primary closure.
Intervention(s): Reconstructive techniques, from rotational flaps to free tissue transfer.
Main outcome measure(s): Outcome data including wound complications, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, and need for surgical revision were tabulated.
Results: Eighty-six patients underwent lateral skull base tumor resection and reconstruction. Procedures were primarily lateral temporal bone resections but also included subtotal temporal bone, total temporal bone, and infratemporal fossa resections. Cutaneous malignancy was the most common resection indication (83%) and the temporalis rotational flap was the most commonly employed reconstructive option (30%). When free tissue transfer techniques were used, the radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, and latissimus dorsi were the most frequent donor sites. Patients with T2 disease were more likely to undergo temporalis flaps, whereas patients with T4 disease were more likely to undergo free flap reconstruction. Major complications were uncommon (∼8%), the most frequent being stroke (∼3%). The postoperative wound complication rate was approximately 45%. The majority involved minor dehiscences and were managed conservatively. Patients with T4 disease were more likely to have wound complications (p < 0.05). Radial forearm free flaps were less likely to have wound complications when compared with other reconstruction techniques (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Many factors go into planning lateral skull base reconstruction. Free flaps were more often used for T4 disease. Radial forearm free flaps tended to have lower wound complication rates when compared with other techniques.
Conflict of interest statement
No financial interests or relationships exist for any of the authors pertinent to the subject of this work.
No conflicts of interests exist for any of the authors pertinent to the subject of this work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Reconstruction of Lateral Skull Base Defects: A Comparison of the Submental Flap to Free and Regional Flaps.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun;154(6):1014-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599816634296. Epub 2016 Mar 15. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016. PMID: 26980913
-
Anterior and middle cranial fossa skull base reconstruction using microvascular free tissue techniques: surgical complications and functional outcomes.Ann Plast Surg. 2008 May;60(5):514-20. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181715707. Ann Plast Surg. 2008. PMID: 18434825
-
Radial forearm free tissue transfer reduces complications in salvage skull base surgery.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Dec;131(6):958-63. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.05.029. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004. PMID: 15577797
-
Microvascular free flaps in skull base reconstruction.Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;74:81-91. doi: 10.1159/000342283. Epub 2012 Dec 18. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 23257555 Review.
-
Endoscopic skull base reconstruction: a review and clinical case series of 152 vascularized flaps used for surgical skull base defects in the setting of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak.Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(4):E4. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.FOCUS14350. Neurosurg Focus. 2014. PMID: 25270144 Review.
Cited by
-
Primary Dural Repair Using Titanium Microclips Following Lateral Skull Base Surgery.J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Jun 3;83(Suppl 2):e306-e311. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729903. eCollection 2022 Jun. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021. PMID: 35832979 Free PMC article.
-
Anterolateral thigh free flap in reconstruction of lateral skull base defects after oncological resection.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Dec;276(12):3487-3494. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05627-x. Epub 2019 Sep 12. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 31515663 Free PMC article.
-
The international expert consensus on management of external auditory canal carcinoma.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Apr;282(4):1677-1691. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09033-w. Epub 2024 Oct 28. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 39466369 Review.
-
Temporal bone resection for lateral skull-base malignancies.J Neurooncol. 2020 Dec;150(3):437-444. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03445-4. Epub 2020 Feb 27. J Neurooncol. 2020. PMID: 32108295 Review.
-
Treatment Strategies for Malignancies of the External Auditory Canal.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):43-53. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00931-3. Epub 2022 Feb 15. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35167009 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Imola MJ, Sciarretta V, Schramm VL. Skull base reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;11:282–90. - PubMed
-
- Marzo SJ, Benscoter B, Leonetti JP. Contemporary options for lateral skull base reconstruction following tumor extirpation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;19:330–4. - PubMed
-
- Schusterman MA, Kroll SS. Reconstruction strategy for temporal bone and lateral facial defects. Ann Plast Surg 1991;26:233–42. - PubMed
-
- Moncrieff MD, Hamilton SA, Lamberty GH, et al. Reconstructive options after temporal bone resection for squamous cell carcinoma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:607–14. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical