Facial Likability and Smiling Enhance Cooperation, but Have No Direct Effect on Moralistic Punishment
- PMID: 27832736
- DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000338
Facial Likability and Smiling Enhance Cooperation, but Have No Direct Effect on Moralistic Punishment
Abstract
The present study serves to test how positive and negative appearance-based expectations affect cooperation and punishment. Participants played a prisoner's dilemma game with partners who either cooperated or defected. Then they were given a costly punishment option: They could spend money to decrease the payoffs of their partners. Aggregated over trials, participants spent more money for punishing the defection of likable-looking and smiling partners compared to punishing the defection of unlikable-looking and nonsmiling partners, but only because participants were more likely to cooperate with likable-looking and smiling partners, which provided the participants with more opportunities for moralistic punishment. When expressed as a conditional probability, moralistic punishment did not differ as a function of the partners' facial likability. Smiling had no effect on the probability of moralistic punishment, but punishment was milder for smiling in comparison to nonsmiling partners.
Keywords: cooperation; facial expression; facial trustworthiness; moralistic punishment; trust.
Similar articles
-
People punish defection, not failures to conform to the majority.Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):1211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50414-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38216621 Free PMC article.
-
Separating conditional and unconditional cooperation in a sequential Prisoner's Dilemma game.PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187952. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 29121671 Free PMC article.
-
Power Asymmetries and Punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma with Variable Cooperative Investment.PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155773. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27191958 Free PMC article.
-
Extortion - A voracious prosocial strategy.Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.033. Epub 2021 Sep 9. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022. PMID: 34710851 Review.
-
Resolving the iterated prisoner's dilemma: theory and reality.J Evol Biol. 2011 Aug;24(8):1628-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02307.x. Epub 2011 May 23. J Evol Biol. 2011. PMID: 21599777 Review.
Cited by
-
Communicating emotions, but not expressing them privately, reduces moral punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma game.Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 6;13(1):14693. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41886-9. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37673945 Free PMC article.
-
Being Negatively Cued, are People Less Cooperative? The Influence of Watching Eyes on Cooperative Behavior.Evol Psychol. 2022 Oct-Dec;20(4):14747049221140302. doi: 10.1177/14747049221140302. Evol Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36444138 Free PMC article.
-
Moral labels increase cooperation and costly punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma game with punishment option.Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89675-6. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33986409 Free PMC article.
-
People punish defection, not failures to conform to the majority.Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):1211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50414-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38216621 Free PMC article.
-
Time pressure and deliberation affect moral punishment.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67268-3. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39014033 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources