Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates
- PMID: 27832743
- PMCID: PMC5103375
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1144-0
Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates
Abstract
Background: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide and the most common reason is repeat CS following previous CS. For most women a vaginal birth after a previous CS (VBAC) is a safe option. However, the rate of VBAC differs in an international perspective. Obtaining deeper knowledge of clinicians' views on VBAC can help in understanding the factors of importance for increasing VBAC rates. Focus group interviews with clinicians and women in three countries with high VBAC rates (Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands) and three countries with low VBAC rates (Ireland, Italy and Germany) are part of "OptiBIRTH", an ongoing research project. The study reported here aims to explore the views of clinicians from countries with low VBAC rates on factors of importance for improving VBAC rates.
Methods: Focus group interviews were held in Ireland, Italy and Germany. In total 71 clinicians participated in nine focus group interviews. Five central questions about VBAC were used and interviews were analysed using content analysis. The analysis was performed in each country in the native language and then translated into English. All data were then analysed together and final categories were validated in each country.
Results: The findings are presented in four main categories with several sub-categories: 1) "prameters for VBAC", including the importance of the obstetric history, present obstetric factors, a positive attitude among those who are centrally involved, early follow-up after CS and antenatal classes; 2) "organisational support and resources for women undergoing a VBAC", meaning a successful VBAC requires clinical expertise and resources during labour; 3) "fear as a key inhibitor of successful VBAC", including understanding women's fear of childbirth, clinicians' fear of VBAC and the ways that clinicians' fear can be transferred to women; and 4) "shared decision making - rapport, knowledge and confidence", meaning ensuring consistent, realistic and unbiased information and developing trust within the clinician-woman relationship.
Conclusions: The findings indicate that increasing the VBAC rate depends on organisational factors, the care offered during pregnancy and childbirth, the decision-making process and the strategies employed to reduce fear in all involved.
Keywords: CS; Clinicians; Content analysis; Focus groups; Midwifery; Qualitative study; VBAC.
Similar articles
-
Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 28;15:196. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0629-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015. PMID: 26314295 Free PMC article.
-
Cultural perspectives on vaginal birth after previous caesarean section in countries with high and low rates - A hermeneutic study.Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):e339-e347. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.07.300. Epub 2019 Aug 22. Women Birth. 2020. PMID: 31445846
-
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: Views of Women From Countries With High VBAC Rates.Qual Health Res. 2017 Feb;27(3):325-340. doi: 10.1177/1049732315612041. Epub 2016 Jul 10. Qual Health Res. 2017. PMID: 26531882
-
Providers' perspective on vaginal birth after cesarean birth: a qualitative systematic review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06921-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 39506738 Free PMC article.
-
Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Current status and where to from here?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 May;224:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Mar 7. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018. PMID: 29547806 Review.
Cited by
-
Acceptance of trial of labor after cesarean (Tolac) among obstetricians in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 May;28(5):2795-2801. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 16. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34012321 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of a Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model in Teaching Hospitals of Addis Ababa University: A Cross-Sectional Study.Biomed Res Int. 2020 Sep 18;2020:1540460. doi: 10.1155/2020/1540460. eCollection 2020. Biomed Res Int. 2020. PMID: 33015154 Free PMC article.
-
Decision-making during trial of labour after caesarean; a qualitative study with gynaecologists.PLoS One. 2018 Jul 18;13(7):e0199887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199887. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30020944 Free PMC article.
-
VBAC: Changes over Last 10 Years.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019 Apr;69(2):110-114. doi: 10.1007/s13224-018-1101-0. Epub 2018 Mar 13. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019. PMID: 30956463 Free PMC article.
-
Mode of birth after caesarean section: individual prediction scores using Scottish population data.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2226-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 30819140 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. WHO statement of caesarean section rates. Geneva. 2015. http://who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health.... Accessed 10 Aug 2016.
-
- EURO-PERISTAT. European perinatal health report: health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010. Paris. 2013. http://www.europeristat.com/reports/european-perinatal-health-report-201.... Accessed 10 Aug 2016.
-
- Fuglenes D, Øian P, Kristiansen IS. Obstetricians’ choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(48):e1–e8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources