Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 10;23(1):78.
doi: 10.1186/s12929-016-0298-4.

Calcitriol stimulates gene expression of cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide in breast cancer cells with different phenotype

Affiliations

Calcitriol stimulates gene expression of cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide in breast cancer cells with different phenotype

Janice García-Quiroz et al. J Biomed Sci. .

Abstract

Background: In normal and neoplastic cells, growth-promoting, proangiogenic, cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic effects have all been attributed to cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP). Nevertheless, little is known about the factors regulating this peptide expression in breast cancer. Herein we asked if the well-known antineoplastic hormone calcitriol could differentially modulate CAMP gene expression in human breast cancer cells depending on the cell phenotype in terms of efficacy and potency.

Methods: The established breast cancer cell lines MCF7, BT-474, HCC1806, HCC1937, SUM-229PE and a primary cell culture generated from invasive ductal breast carcinoma were used in this study. Calcitriol regulation of cathelicidin gene expression in vitro and in human breast cancer xenografts was studied by real time PCR. Tumorigenicity was evaluated for each cell line in athymic mice.

Results: Estrogen receptor (ER)α + breast cancer cells showed the highest basal CAMP gene expression. When incubated with calcitriol, CAMP gene expression was stimulated in a dose-dependent and cell phenotype-independent manner. Efficacy of calcitriol was lower in ERα + cells when compared to ERα- cells (<10 vs. >70 folds over control, respectively). Conversely, calcitriol lowest potency upon CAMP gene expression was observed in the ERα-/EGFR+ SUM-229PE cell line (EC50 = 70.8 nM), while the highest was in the basal-type/triple-negative cells HCC1806 (EC50 = 2.13 nM) followed by ERα + cells MCF7 and BT-474 (EC50 = 4.42 nM and 14.6 nM, respectively). In vivo, lower basal CAMP gene expression was related to increased tumorigenicity and lack of ERα expression. Xenografted triple-negative breast tumors of calcitriol-treated mice showed increased CAMP gene expression compared to vehicle-treated animals.

Conclusions: Independently of the cell phenotype, calcitriol provoked a concentration-dependent stimulation on CAMP gene expression, showing greater potency in the triple negative HCC1806 cell line. Efficacy of calcitriol was lower in ERα + cells when compared to ERα- cells in terms of stimulating CAMP gene expression. Lower basal CAMP and lack of ERα gene expression was related to increased tumorigenicity. Our results suggest that calcitriol anti-cancer therapy is more likely to induce higher levels of CAMP in ERα- breast cancer cells, when compared to ERα + breast cancer cells.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Calcitriol; Cathelicidin; LL-37; Vitamin D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Basal CAMP gene expression. Basal CAMP gene expression was evaluated in several breast cancer cell lines with different phenotype. Data are depicted as the mean ± SD. N = 3. Results were normalized against ACTB mRNA expression
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CAMP is transcriptionally upregulated by calcitriol in different human breast cancer cell lines. Cells were incubated in the presence of different calcitriol concentrations during 24 h. Afterwards cells were processed for qPCR. CAMP mRNA levels were obtained by normalizing against ACTB mRNA expression. Vehicle values were set to one. N = 3, *P < 0.05 vs. control
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CAMP gene expression is stimulated by calcitriol in xenografted tumors. IDC (white bars) and HCC1806 (black bars) cells were inoculated in athymic mice. After tumor onset calcitriol was administered once per week during 3 weeks. Mice were sacrificed and tumors were collected to evaluate CAMP gene expression by qPCR. Results are depicted as the mean ± SEM. Controls were set to one N ≥ 5; *P < 0.05 vs. control
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Calcitriol reduces tumor growth in mice xenografted with human breast cancer cells. HCC1806 cells (triangles) and IDC cells (circles) were subcutaneously injected in athymic mice, which were treated without (black) or with 12.5 μg/kg calcitriol (white) during three weeks. Relative tumor volume is shown as the mean ± SEM. N ≥ 5

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Okumura K, Itoh A, Isogai E, Hirose K, Hosokawa Y, Abiko Y, Shibata T, Hirata M, Isogai H. C-terminal domain of human CAP18 antimicrobial peptide induces apoptosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma SAS-H1 cells. Cancer Lett. 2004;212:185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.04.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winder D, Gunzburg WH, Erfle V, Salmons B. Expression of antimicrobial peptides has an antitumour effect in human cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;242:608–612. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.8014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruns H, Buttner M, Fabri M, Mougiakakos D, Bittenbring JT, Hoffmann MH, Beier F, Pasemann S, Jitschin R, Hofmann AD, et al. Vitamin D-dependent induction of cathelicidin in human macrophages results in cytotoxicity against high-grade B cell lymphoma. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:282ra247. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3230. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buchau AS, Morizane S, Trowbridge J, Schauber J, Kotol P, Bui JD, Gallo RL. The host defense peptide cathelicidin is required for NK cell-mediated suppression of tumor growth. J Immunol. 2010;184:369–378. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902110. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heilborn JD, Nilsson MF, Jimenez CI, Sandstedt B, Borregaard N, Tham E, Sorensen OE, Weber G, Stahle M. Antimicrobial protein hCAP18/LL-37 is highly expressed in breast cancer and is a putative growth factor for epithelial cells. Int J Cancer. 2005;114:713–719. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20795. - DOI - PubMed