Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 10;58(1):77.
doi: 10.1186/s13028-016-0261-0.

Farm characteristics and management routines related to neonatal porcine diarrhoea: a survey among Swedish piglet producers

Affiliations

Farm characteristics and management routines related to neonatal porcine diarrhoea: a survey among Swedish piglet producers

Jenny Larsson et al. Acta Vet Scand. .

Abstract

Background: In recent years reports from a number of countries, including Sweden, describe problems with diarrhoea in newborn piglets despite the use of previously effective preventive measures. This seemingly altered disease pattern of neonatal porcine diarrhoea (NPD) warrants investigations on the magnitude and manifestation of the problem. The aim of the present study was to investigate the herd-level prevalence of NPD in Sweden and to describe disease characteristics and intervention strategies used in affected herds. To obtain this information a questionnaire was developed and sent out to 170 randomly selected herds. The presence of NPD in the herds was specified as "Yes", "No" or "Occasional cases" during the preceding year.

Results: A response rate of 58% (98/170) was achieved. The total prevalence of farmer experienced NPD, including occasional cases was 79.6% (95% CI 70.6-86.4%). Most herds (85%; 83/98) employed maternal vaccination against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). The most common treatment regimens used in affected herds included antimicrobials only (43%; 18/42) or antimicrobials in combination with supplementary fluids (33%; 14/42). Trimethoprim in combination with a sulphonamide was the drug of choice in 57% (24/42) of the affected herds whereas the remaining herds used a broad range of other antimicrobials (neomycin, amoxicillin, fluoroquinolones, penicillin, and tylosin). Furthermore, the risk of experiencing NPD was found to be higher in herds with >200 sows (OR = 4.0) compared to herds with <200 sows and in herds where more ambitious efforts (such as providing supplemental colostrum or practicing split-suckling) were made to save weak-born piglets (OR = 4.4).

Conclusions: The results of the present study indicate that Swedish farmers commonly experience NPD in their herds, often despite vaccination against ETEC. Considering the extent of this problem and its contribution to antimicrobial usage, improving alternative control strategies for NPD needs to be prioritized.

Keywords: Neonatal porcine diarrhoea; New neonatal porcine diarrhoea; Pigs; Prevalence; Prevention; Risk factors; Swine; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of data processing and analyses. The questionnaire included a total of 59 questions corresponding to 63 variables (including the outcome), as some questions included information on more than one parameter. In the illustration above “n” denotes the number of variables in the different sections of the questionnaire and in the following data processing and statistical analyses

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thomson JR, Friendship RM. Digestive system. In: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW, editors. Diseases of Swine. 10. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. pp. 216–218.
    1. Sjölund M, Zoric M, Wallgren P. Financial impact of disease on pig production. Part III. Gastrointestinal disorders. In: proceedings of the 6th European symposium of Porcine Health Management. Italy: Sorrento; 2014.
    1. Carvajal A, Argüello H, Martínez-Lobo FJ, Costillas S, Miranda R, de Nova PJ, et al. Porcine epidemic diarrhoea: new insights into an old disease. Porcine Health Manag. 2015;1:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s40813-015-0007-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martineau GP, Vaillancourt JP, Broes A. Principal Neonatal Diseases. In: Varley MA, editor. The Neonatal Pig-Development and Survival. Wallingford: CAB International; 1995. pp. 239–264.
    1. Drew M, Owen B. The provision of passive immunity to colostrum-deprived piglets by bovine or porcine serum immunoglobulins. Can J Anim Sci. 1988;68:1277–1284. doi: 10.4141/cjas88-143. - DOI