Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Nov 10;20(1):367.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1538-4.

Resting energy expenditure, calorie and protein consumption in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study

Oren Zusman  1 , Miriam Theilla  2   3 , Jonathan Cohen  2   4 , Ilya Kagan  2 , Itai Bendavid  2 , Pierre Singer  2   4
Affiliations
Observational Study

Resting energy expenditure, calorie and protein consumption in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study

Oren Zusman et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: Intense debate exists regarding the optimal energy and protein intake for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, most studies use predictive equations, demonstrated to be inaccurate to target energy intake. We sought to examine the outcome of a large cohort of ICU patients in relation to the percent of administered calories divided by resting energy expenditure (% AdCal/REE) obtained by indirect calorimetry (IC) and to protein intake.

Methods: Included patients were hospitalized from 2003 to 2015 at a 16-bed ICU at a university affiliated, tertiary care hospital, and had IC measurement to assess caloric targets. Data were drawn from a computerized system and included the % AdCal/REE and protein intake and other variables. A Cox proportional hazards model for 60-day mortality was used, with the % AdCal/REE modeled to accommodate non-linearity. Length of stay (LOS) and length of ventilation (LOV) were also assessed.

Results: A total of 1171 patients were included. The % AdCal/REE had a significant non-linear (p < 0.01) association with mortality after adjusting for other variables (p < 0.01). Increasing the percentage from zero to 70 % resulted in a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.98 (CI 0.97-0.99) pointing to reduced mortality, while increases above 70 % suggested an increase in mortality with a HR of 1.01 (CI 1.01-1.02). Increasing protein intake was also associated with decreased mortality (HR 0.99, CI 0.98-0.99, p = 0.02). An AdCal/REE >70 % was associated with an increased LOS and LOV.

Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that both underfeeding and overfeeding appear to be harmful to critically ill patients, such that achieving an Adcal/REE of 70 % had a survival advantage. A higher caloric intake may also be associated with harm in the form of increased LOS and LOV. The optimal way to define caloric goals therefore requires an exact estimate, which is ideally performed using indirect calorimetry. These findings may provide a basis for future randomized controlled trials comparing specific nutritional regimens based on indirect calorimetry measurements.

Keywords: Calorie consumption; Indirect calorimetry; Nutrition; Protein; Resting energy expenditure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Daily mean administered calories/resting energy expenditure (Adcal/REE) percent by indirect calorimetry (IC)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Association of administered calories/resting energy expenditure (Adcal/REE) percent with 60-day mortality (left), and protein intake by daily requirement (1.3 g/kg/d) with 60-day mortality (right) by odds ratio. REE resting energy expenditure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Association between administered calories/resting energy expenditure (Adcal/REE) percent and 60-day survival. Labels correspond to Adcal/REE percent
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Singer P, Anbar R, Cohen J, Shapiro H, Shalita-Chesner M, Lev S, et al. The tight calorie control study (TICACOS): a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study of nutritional support in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:601–9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2146-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heyland DK, Cahill N, Day AG. Optimal amount of calories for critically ill patients: depends on how you slice the cake! Crit Care Med. 2011;39:2619–26. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318226641d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N, Jeejeebhoy K, Day AG, Dhaliwal R, et al. The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1728–37. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1567-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arabi YM, Aldawood AS, Haddad SH, Al-Dorzi HM, Tamim HM, Jones G, et al. Permissive underfeeding or standard enteral feeding in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2398–408. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1502826. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, Hite RD, et al. Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:795–803. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.137. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances